Table 2.
Biomarkers/ Diagnostic Model |
Biomarker Type |
Expression Level in HCC | EV isolation Method 1 | Number of Patients | Sen/Spe (%) |
AUROC | Study Type | Restricts HCC to Early-Stage? | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amount of total EVs | – | ↑ | Ultracentrifugation | 28 TNM stage I HCC vs. 40 cirrhosis | 63/89 | 0.83 | Case-control | Yes | [12] |
Amount of AnnexinV+ EpCAM+ ASGPR1+ EV | – | ↑ | Ultracentrifugation | 86 HCC vs. 49 cirrhosis | 81/47 | 0.73 | Case-control | No | [13] |
FIBG | Protein | – (↑in iCCA) |
Filtration and Ultracentrifugation | 29 HCC vs. 12 iCCA | 83/90 | 0.89 | Case-control | No | [113] |
SMAD3 | Protein | ↑ | ExoQuick™ Exosome Precipitation Solution | 29 HCC vs. 37 HD + benign hepatoma | –/– | 0.70 | Case-control | No | [99] |
A panel combining miR-122, miR-148a, and AFP | miRNA + AFP |
↑ | Ultracentrifugation, filtration, and precipitation | 50 HCC vs. 40 cirrhosis | 86/88 | 0.93 | Case-control | No | [114] |
A panel combining miR-10b-5p, miR-221-3p, miR-223-3p, and miR-21-5p | miRNA | ↑ | ExoEnrich™ instant exosome isolation kit and immunoaffinity capture (anti-ASGR2) | 38 HCC vs. 35 CH + 25 cirrhosis | 59/95 | 0.80 | Case-control | No | [115] |
miR-18a, miR-101, miR-106b, miR-122, miR-195, miR-221, miR-222, miR-224 | miRNA | ↑(18a, 221, 222, 224) ↓(101, 106b, 122, 195) |
Ultracentrifugation | 20 HCC vs. 20 cirrhosis vs. 20 CH B | –/– | – | Case-control | No | [116] |
LINC00853 | lncRNA | ↑ | ExoQuick™ Exosome Precipitation Solution | 32 early-stage HCC (single, <2 cm) vs. 28 CH + 35 cirrhosis | 94/85 | 0.96 | Case-control | Yes | [117] |
Lnc85 | lncRNA | ↑ | Ribo™ Exosome Isolation Reagent | 122 HCC vs. 43 cirrhosis | 80/74 | 0.89 | Case-control | No | [118] |
RN7SL1 S fragment | lncRNA | ↑ | Ultracentrifugation and Filtration | 25 HCC vs. 25 healthy donors | –/– | 0.75 | Case-control | No | [119] |
A risk score panel combining AFP and ENSG00000248932.1, ENST00000440688.1, ENST00000457302.2 |
lncRNA + AFP |
↑ | ExoQuick™ Exosome Precipitation Solution | Training set: 20 HCC vs. 20 CH Validation set: 180 HCC vs. 180 CH |
–/– | 0.97 0.87 |
Case-control | No | [120] |
A panel combining circ_0004001, circ_0004123, and circ_0075792 |
circRNA | ↑ | Ultracentrifugation | 71 HCC vs. 40 HD | 91/78 | 0.89 | Case-control | No | [121] |
A panel combining 8 long RNAs | – | ↑ | exoRNeasy Maxi Kit | Training set: 44 HCC vs. 78 HD 1st Validation set: 27 HCC vs. 53 HD 2nd Validation set: 33 HCC vs. 33 HD + 6 hepatic benign disorders |
84/94 89/91 –/– |
0.95 0.96 0.96 |
Case-control | No | [122] |
LDHC | mRNA | ↑ | exoRNeasy Midi Kit | 50 TNM stage I/II HCC vs. 100 HD | 88/93 | 0.95 | Case-control | Yes | [123] |
A panel combining AFP, GPC3, ALB, APOH, FABP1, FGB, FGG, AHSG, RBP4,TF | mRNA | ↑ | EV Click Chip (immunoaffinity + microfluidic device) | 36 BCLC stage 0-A HCC vs. 26 cirrhosis | 84/88 | 0.93 | Case-control | Yes | [38] |
1 ExoEnrich™ instant exosome isolation kit is produced by ExoCan Healthcare Technologies Private Limited, India; ExoQuick™ Exosome Precipitation Solution is produced by System Biosciences, USA; exoRNeasy Midi/Maxi Kit is produced by Qiagen, Germany; Ribo™ Exosome Isolation Reagent is produced by RiboBio, China. AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; AHSG, alpha 2-HS glycoprotein; ALB, albumin; APOH, apolipoprotein H; ASGPR1, asialoglycoprotein receptor 1; ASGR 2, asialoglycoprotein receptor 2; AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic liver cancer; CH, chronic hepatitis; CH B, chronic hepatitis B; circRNA, circular RNA; FABP1, fatty acid binding protein 1; EpCAM, epithelial cell adhesion molecule; EVs, extracellular vesicles; FIBG, fibrinogen gamma chain; FGB, fibrinogen beta chain; FGG, fibrinogen gamma cha; GPC3, glypican 3; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HD, healthy donors; iCCA, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; LDHC, actate dehydrogenase C; lncRNA, long non-coding RNA; miRNA, microRNA; RBP4, retinol binding protein 4; RN7SL1, RNA component of signal recognition particle 7SL1; SMAD3, SMAD family member 3; TF, transferrin.