Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 16;10(12):2656. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122656

Table 1.

Physiological parameters used to individualize positive end-expiratory pressure.

Parameter Evaluated Surgical Setting How to Individualize PEEP Range of PEEP Studied Monitoring Tool Results
∆P [8,34,35,39,40] Open abdominal surgery [8,34,39,40]
Laparoscopy [34,38]
Thoracic surgery [34,35]
The lowest PEEP associated with the lowest ∆P [35,39]
The highest PEEP associated with the lowest ∆P [38,40]
N/A None ∆P < 13 cmH2O could reduce PPCs
Targeting low ∆P results in low ∆PL
EFL [67] Open abdominal surgery PEEP value able to reverse EFL N/A None Lower PPCs in patients with reversed EFL
Pulmonary shunt [91] Open abdominal surgery
Laparoscopy
PEEP associated with the lowest shunt 0 to 10 cmH2O Beacon system Better oxygenation
Intra-abdominal pressure [94] Laparoscopy PEEP = IAP + 2 cmH2O 10 to 17 cmH2O IAP measurement Lower ∆PL
RVDI [95] Laparoscopy PEEP associated with the lowest RVDI 8 to 20 cmH2O (IQR) EIT Better oxygenation, higher EELV
FRC [98] Laparoscopy PEEP able to maintain stable FRC 0 to 20 cmH2O EIT Normal FRC, low shunt
Lung collapse and hyperdistension [3] Laparoscopy Best compromise between collapse and hyperdistension 6 to 16 cmH2O EIT Lower postoperative atelectasis, lower intraoperative ∆P
Airway closure [113] Laparoscopy, obese patients PEEP value able to reach AOP 5 to 10 cmH2O None High rate of airway closure with PEEP range studied
PL [118] Laparoscopy, obese patients PEEP value able to reach PL = 0 cmH2O 10 to 25 cmH2O Esophageal catheter Positive PL
∆PL [54] Laparoscopy, obese patients PEEP associated with lowest ∆PL 0 to 37 cmH2O Esophageal catheter Lower ∆PL

PEEP: positive end-expiratory pressure; ∆P: driving pressure; EFL: expiratory flow limitation; RVDI: regional ventilation delay index; FRC: functional residual capacity; PL: transpulmonary pressure; ∆PL: transpulmonary driving pressure.