Table 1.
Parameter Evaluated | Surgical Setting | How to Individualize PEEP | Range of PEEP Studied | Monitoring Tool | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
∆P [8,34,35,39,40] | Open abdominal surgery [8,34,39,40] Laparoscopy [34,38] Thoracic surgery [34,35] |
The lowest PEEP associated with the lowest ∆P [35,39] The highest PEEP associated with the lowest ∆P [38,40] |
N/A | None | ∆P < 13 cmH2O could reduce PPCs Targeting low ∆P results in low ∆PL |
EFL [67] | Open abdominal surgery | PEEP value able to reverse EFL | N/A | None | Lower PPCs in patients with reversed EFL |
Pulmonary shunt [91] | Open abdominal surgery Laparoscopy |
PEEP associated with the lowest shunt | 0 to 10 cmH2O | Beacon system | Better oxygenation |
Intra-abdominal pressure [94] | Laparoscopy | PEEP = IAP + 2 cmH2O | 10 to 17 cmH2O | IAP measurement | Lower ∆PL |
RVDI [95] | Laparoscopy | PEEP associated with the lowest RVDI | 8 to 20 cmH2O (IQR) | EIT | Better oxygenation, higher EELV |
FRC [98] | Laparoscopy | PEEP able to maintain stable FRC | 0 to 20 cmH2O | EIT | Normal FRC, low shunt |
Lung collapse and hyperdistension [3] | Laparoscopy | Best compromise between collapse and hyperdistension | 6 to 16 cmH2O | EIT | Lower postoperative atelectasis, lower intraoperative ∆P |
Airway closure [113] | Laparoscopy, obese patients | PEEP value able to reach AOP | 5 to 10 cmH2O | None | High rate of airway closure with PEEP range studied |
PL [118] | Laparoscopy, obese patients | PEEP value able to reach PL = 0 cmH2O | 10 to 25 cmH2O | Esophageal catheter | Positive PL |
∆PL [54] | Laparoscopy, obese patients | PEEP associated with lowest ∆PL | 0 to 37 cmH2O | Esophageal catheter | Lower ∆PL |
PEEP: positive end-expiratory pressure; ∆P: driving pressure; EFL: expiratory flow limitation; RVDI: regional ventilation delay index; FRC: functional residual capacity; PL: transpulmonary pressure; ∆PL: transpulmonary driving pressure.