Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 26;9:75. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00432-6

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Study Mean age (SD) Mean BMI (SD) % of females Intervention(s) Comparator(s) Intensity of contact Feedback provider Intervention length Follow-up

Blomfield et al. 2013 [38]

Australia

47.5 (11.0) 32.7 (3.5) 0

SHED-IT online

(n = 53)

SHED-IT Program materials (n = 54)

Wait-list (n = 52)

IC (SHED-IT WBE)

SH (SHED-IT Program materials)

Human (SHED-IT) 12 weeks 24 weeks

Chambliss et al.

2011 [39]

USA

45.0 (10.3) 30.5 83

WBB (n = 45)

WBE (n = 45)

Wait-list (n = 30)

GSH (WBB)

MC (WBE)

Human (Both conditions) 12 Weeks

Collins et al. 2012 [41]

Australia

42.0 (10.2) 32.3 (4.0) 58

WBB (n = 99)

WBE (n = 106)

Wait-list (n = 104)

SH (WBB)

MC (WBE)

Machine (WBE) 12 weeks

Collins et al. 2013 [40]

Australia

41.9 (10.2) 32.2 (3.9) 58.5

WBB (n = 143)

WBE (n = 158)

Comparison between intervention groups

SH (WBB)

MC (WBE)

Machine (WBE) 24 weeks

Gabriele et al. 2010 [42]

USA

45.4 (8.7) 32.1 (4.3) 83.7

Minimal E-Coach Support (n = 34)

Directive E-Coach Support (n = 35)

Non-Directive E-Coach Support (n = 35)

Comparison between intervention groups

GSH (Minimal E-Coach Support)

MC (Non-Directive E-Coach Support)

IC (Directive E-Coach Support)

Human

(All conditions)

12 weeks

Gold et al. 2007

USA [43]

47.7 (10.3) 32.4 (4.1) 81.5

eDiets (n = 62)

VTrim (n = 62)

Comparison between intervention groups

MC (eDiets)

IC (VTrim)

Machine (eDiets)

Human (VTrim)

24 weeks 48 weeks

Hunter et al. 2008 [44]

USA

34.0 (7.3) 29.4 (3.0) 50.2 BIT + LEARN program (n = 224)

Usual Care

(n = 222)

IC (BIT + LEARN)

SH (Usual Care)

Human

(BIT + L.EARN)

24 weeks

Morgan et al. 2009 [47]

Australia

35.9 (11.1) 30.6 (2.8) 0 SHED-IT (n = 34) Information (n = 31)

IC (SHED-IT)

SH (Information)

Human (SHED-IT) 12 weeks 24 weeks

Morgan et al. 2010 [48]

Australia

35.9 (11.1) 30.6 (2.8) 0 SHED-IT (n = 34) Information (n = 31)

IC (SHED-IT)

SH (Information)

Human (SHED-IT) 12 weeks 48 weeks

Morgan et al. 2011 [46]

Australia

44.4 (8.6) 30.5 (3.6) 0 POWER (n = 65) Wait-list (n = 45) IC (POWER) Human (POWER) 14 weeks

Morgan et al. 2013 [45]

Australia

47.5 (11.0) 32.7 (3.5) 0 SHED-IT (n = 53)

SHED-IT Program materials (n = 54)

Wait-list (n = 52)

IC (SHED-IT)

SH (SHED-IT Program materials)

Human (SHED-IT) 12 weeks 24 weeks

O’Brien et al. 2014 [49]

Australia

41.6 (10.2) 32.3 (3.9) 58.5

WBB (n = 94)

WBE (n = 98)

Wait-list (n = 97)

SH (WBB)

MC (WBE)

Machine (WBE) 12 weeks

Tate et al. 2001 [50]

USA

40.9 (10.6) 29.0 (3.0) 89

IE (n = 45)

IBT (n = 46)

Comparison between intervention groups

MC (IE)

IC (IBT)

Human (Both conditions) 24 weeks

Thomas et al. 2017 [51]

USA

55.0 (11.5) 33.9 (3.7) 77.5

WWO (n = 94)

WWO + AL

(n = 91)

Newsletters

(n = 86)

SH (WWO)

GSH (WWO + AL)

SH (Newsletters)

Machine

(WWO + AL)

48 weeks

Womble et al. 2004 [52]

USA

43.7 (10.2) 33.5 (3.1) 100 eDiets (n = 23)

LEARN program

(n = 24)

GSH (eDiets)

SH (LEARN)

Human (eDiets) 48 weeks

BIT Behavioral Internet Therapy, GSH Guided Self-Help, IC Intensive contact, IBT Internet Behavior Therapy, IE Internet Education, LEARN Lifestyle Exercise Attitudes Relationships Nutrition, MC Minimal Contact, POWER Preventing Obesity Without Eating Like a Rabbit, SH Self-Help, SHED-IT Self-Help Exercise and Diet using Internet Technologya, WBB Web-Based Basic, WBE Web-Based Enhanced

aRegardless of the SHED-IT program means Self-Help, in this study have been classified as intensive contact because of the proportion of weekly-personalized feedback the four first weeks