Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 18;10(12):2694. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122694

Table 2.

Procedural characteristics and the type of ERAF after catheter ablation in obese females and obese males.

Females (n = 54) Males (n = 60)
Cryoablation
(n = 30)
RF Ablation
(n = 24)
Cryoablation
(n = 30)
RF Ablation
(n = 30)
Age, years 63 ± 5.8 ## 64 ± 6.9 62 ± 5.5 58 ± 9.0 *
BMI, kg/m2 # 32.8 ± 3.5 29.8 ± 4.6 ** 31.0 ± 2.1 30.5 ± 3.0
Total procedure time, min 105.2 ± 30.2 196.9 ± 52.1 **** 98.6 ± 25.0 199.7 ± 37.7 ****
Fluoroscopy time, min 15.5 ± 5.9 8.3 ± 3.3 **** 14.3 ± 5.4 9.2 ± 4.5 ***
Application time, min 30.5 ± 8.7 54.9 ± 16.2 **** 28.2 ± 8.2 58.4 ± 17.5 ****
Application number 8.2 ± 2.4 47.2 ± 50.9 **** 7.8 ± 2.3 25.2 ± 10.1 ****
ERAF, n (%) 5 (17) 5 (21) 5 (17) 8 (27)
Paroxysmal ERAF, n (%) 4 (13) 3 (12.5) 3 (10) 4 (13)
Persistent ERAF, n (%) 1 (3) 2 (8) 2 (7) 4 (13)

* Significant difference CB vs. RF ablation, # significance difference females vs. males. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.05.