Table 4.
Admission | Assess-ment | Referral | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ambu-lance | Police | ER | Psychia-try Ward | Mental Health Care Facility | Depen-dency Health- care | Munici-pality | Total times reported | ||
Improvements made during pilot | |||||||||
Number of participants per referral party | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
In ER: IPCB in adequate place for help | 2 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | |
Smoother flow-through the healthcare system | 1 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 15 | |
Better cooperation between referral parties | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 12 | |
No difference noticed | |||||||||
No difference in daily routine | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
No difference in flow-through the healthcare system | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
Still to improve | |||||||||
Noticeable aversion towards psychiatric patients in Emergency Department | 1 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
Referral to follow-up care could have been faster | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | |
Still uncertainty for best option referral for follow-up care | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
This table only contains an overview of the most reported statements