Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 16;147(8):2407–2420. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03521-w

Table 9.

Pairwise meta-analysis of VEGFR-TKIs’ cardiac event

Direct compare Study number Total sample Odds ratio (95% CI) Method Heterogeneity
Suntinib vs placebo 2 1416 1.37(0.65,2.88) M–H random I2 = 0% (P = 0.38)
Sorafenib vs placebo 5 4278 2.12 (0.86,5.19) M–H Random I2 = 40% (P = 0.16)
Regorafenib vs placebo 3 583 1.16 (0.24,5.63) M–H random I2 = 43% (P = 0.18)
Vandetanib vs placebo 5 1619 15.01 (4.66, 48.37) M–H random I2 = 0% (P = 0.92)
Pazopanib vs placebo 4 1943 6.67(1.98,22.51) M–H random I2 = 0% (P = 0.73)
Nintedanib vs sorafenib 2 188 0.31(0.04,2.56) M–H random I2 = 0% (P = 0.62)