Table 2.

Summary of the multiple regression analyses for each theory for each behaviour

Theory	Physical distancing	β	Face covering	β	Handwashing	β
SCT RAA a	Self‐efficacy	0.222	Self‐efficacy	0.228 0.230	Self‐efficacy	0.157
	Intention	0.235	Intention	0.427 0.433	Intention	0.507
	Behavioural norms	n.s.	Behavioural norms	−0.068	Behavioural norms	n.s.
	R 2 = 0.157 (F(2, 2,944) = 276.0, p < .001)		R 2 = 0.361 (F(2, 2,366) = 671.2, p < .001) R 2 = 0.366 (F(3, 2,364) = 456.1, p < .001) ( $R_{\text{change}}^2$  = .005, F(1,2,364) =17.2, p < .001)		R 2 = 0.361 (F(2, 2,957) = 838.4, p < .001)
CS‐SRM b	Timeline (duration)	0.067	Timeline (recurrence)	0.164	Timeline (duration)	0.027
	Timeline (recurrence)	0.050	Consequences	0.097	Timeline (recurrence)	0.064
	CAUSE (other people not keeping their distance)	0.064	Cause (my not washing my hands enough)	−0.137	Cause (my not wearing a face covering)	0.028
	Emotional representation (anxiousness)	0.076	Cause (my not wearing a face covering)	0.578	Cause (other people not keeping their distance)	0.074
			cause (other people not keeping their distance)	0.111
			emotional representation (worry)	0.098
	R 2 = 0.048 (F(15, 2,014) = 6.8, p < .001)		R 2 = 0.141 (F(15, 1,836) = 19.9, p < .001)		R 2 = 0.059 (F(15, 2,014) = 8.4, p < .001)
PMT	Perceived severity	0.174	Perceived severity	0.087	Perceived severity	0.108
	Response efficacy	0.052	Response efficacy	0.028	Response efficacy	0.059
	Response self‐efficacy	0.305	Response self‐efficacy	0.491	Response self‐efficacy	0.398
	R 2 = 0.150 (F(4, 2,206) = 98.6, p < .001)		R 2 = 0.267 (F(4, 1,847) = 168.0, p < .001)		R 2 = 0.186 (F(4, 2,206) = 127.5, p < .001)

^a For the RAA model, behavioural norm was added to SE and intention, figures in italics represent the data for the RAA model.

^b Only significant associations are shown.