Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 14;118(25):e2023647118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023647118

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

TAK1 inhibition impairs mitochondria, which is restored by hydrogen sulfide but not by general ROS scavenger. (A) Tak1iKO BMDMs were treated with vehicle (ethanol, EtOH) or with 4OHT for 5 d. Some EtOH-treated cells were also treated with 300 nM 5ZOZ for 5 h before the fixation. Mitochondrial morphology was visualized with anti-TOM20 immunofluorescence staining. (B) Quantification of mitochondrial morphology changes at 5 d post EtOH or 4OHT treatment. Some EtOH-treated cells were treated with 300 nM 5ZOZ and 3 mM NAC for 5 h. (C) Different types of ROS modulators; modulators of mitochondrial electron flux, sodium sulfide (0.4 mM); cysteine (3 mM); NAC (3 mM); or a general free radical scavenger, tBHQ (20 µM), were simultaneously treated with 300 nM 5ZOZ in BMDMs for 18 h. Cells were analyzed with CM-H2DCFDA (DCFDA) and Sytox Red or with MitoSox and Sytox Green. MFIs of live cells relative to that in vehicle-treated cells (none) are shown. Effectiveness of tBHQ was verified in separate experiments shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S2. One-way ANOVA, multiple comparisons, and Tukey test; N.S., not significant (B and C).