Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 25;11(6):e042406. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042406

Table 3.

Association between urgency allocation, diagnosed ACS and other LTEs

Women ACS
n=85 (8.6%)
No ACS
n=908 (91.4%)
P value 1* P value 2†
U1 62 (72.9) 371 (40.9) <0.001 <0.001
U2 12 (14.1) 231 (25.4)
U3–U5 11 (13.0) 306 (33.6)
Men ACS
n=120 (15.0%)
No ACS
n=682 (85.0%)
U1 84 (70.0) 290 (42.5) <0.001 <0.001
U2 19 (15.8) 142 (20.8)
U3–U5 17 (14.2) 250 (36.7)
Women ACS or LTE
n=107 (10.8%)
No ACS or LTE
n=886 (89.2%)
U1 71 (66.4) 362 (40.9) <0.001 <0.001
U2 21 (19.6) 222 (25.1)
U3–U5 15 (14.0) 302 (34.0)
Men ACS or LTE
n=143 (17.8%)
No ACS or LTE
n=659 (82.2%)
U1 96 (67.1) 278 (42.2) <0.001 <0.001
U2 24 (16.8) 137 (20.8)
U3–U5 23 (16.1) 244 (37.0)

*P value 1: U1 vs U2, U3, U4 and U5.

†P value 2: U1, U2 vs U3, U4, U5.

‡LTEs consist of ACS, pulmonary embolism, thoracic aortic dissection, acute heart failure, stroke, abdominal aortic aneurysm, severe COPD exacerbation, diabetic ketoacidosis, coronary spasm probably caused by hypokalaemia, epileptic insult, bleeding from oesophageal varices, ovarian torsion and ventricular fibrillation.

ACS, acute coronary syndrome; LTE, life-threatening event.