Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 25;100(25):e26214. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026214

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors affecting DFS.

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Variables Odds ratio (95% CI) P value Odds ratio (95% CI) P value
Sex 0.794 (0.408–1.544) .496
Age 1.023 (0.994–1.054) .126
Distance from anal verge (cm) 1.019 (0.974–1.067) .405
pre-CRT CEA level (ng/mL) 1.207 (0.638–2.285) .563
Tumour differentiation 3.351 (1.778–6.315) <.001 1.847 (0.935–3.648) .077
Clinical stage 1.608 (0.857–3.017) .139
Surgery 0.997 (0.984–1.011) .703
TRG 0.979 (0.954–1.005) .144
ypT 6.141 (2.181–17.289) .001 2.872 (0.951–8.673) .061
ypN 3.365 (1.729–6.551) <.001 2.242 (1.103–4.556) .026
LVI 0.669 (0.295–1.517) .336
CD45RO+ratio 0.228 (0.104–0.497) <.001 0.339 (0.153–0.752) .008

CEA= carcinoembryonic antigen, CRT = chemoradiotherapy, LVI = lymphovascular invasion, TRG = tumor regression grade.

The multivariate Cox analysis revealed that elevated CD45RO+ratio was an independent factor for better DFS (OR, 0.339; 95% CI, 0.153–0.752; P = .008).