Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 25;100(25):e26357. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026357

Table 3.

MF between two groups pre- and post-intervention (Hz).

Control group Observation group
Baseline After P1 Baseline After P1 P2
Erector spine muscle
 Healthy side 78.44 ± 12.03 86.50 ± 11.25 t = -7.55 P = .00 79.22 ± 12.33 94.39 ± 12.01 t = -11.21 P = .00 t = -2.09 P = .04
 Affected side 75.39 ± 12.27 85.83 ± 11.01 t = -11.08 P = .00 75.39 ± 12.61 92.06 ± 13.44 t = -13.77 P = .00 t = -1.56 P = .13
Polyfidus muscle
 Healthy side 84.23 ± 16.97 94.06 ± 9.33 t = -26.01 P = .00 90.22 ± 11.71 103.56 ± 10.41 t = -13.15 P = .00 t = -2.96 P = .01
 Affected side 80.89 ± 8.48 89.28 ± 7.79 t = -8.52 P = .00 84.00 ± 15.34 101.74 ± 12.60 t = -21.91 P = .00 t = -3.67 P = .01

The MF of affected side of the erector muscle of spine and multifidus muscles in the observation group after 4 weeks intervention was significantly higher than those before treatment both in the observation and control group (P < .05, respectively). P1 = P value compared within group, P2 = P value compared between two groups after therapy.