Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 25;100(25):e26477. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026477

Table 1.

Comparison of patients with SETs according to gastric location.

Total (N = 33) Upper + middle third (N = 28, %) Lower third (N = 5, %)
Age, yrs (mean ± SD) 57.7 ± 13.2 57.1 ± 13.1 60.8 ± 14.9
Female, n (%) 19 (57.6) 16 (57.1) 3 (60)
Male, n (%) 14 (42.4) 12 (42.9) 2 (40)
Endoscopic finding
 Intact mucosa 27 (81.8) 24 (85.7) 3 (60)
 Ulceration 3 (9.1) 2 (7.1) 1 (20)
 Dimpling 2 (6.1) 2 (7.1)
 Erosive mucosa 1 (3.0) 1 (20)
Layer
 3th layer 7 (21.2) 6 (21.4) 1 (20)
 4th layer 18 (54.5) 16 (57.1) 2 (40)
 Outer wall 2 (6.1) 2 (7.1)
 Not clearly identified 6 (18.2) 4 (14.3) 2 (40)
Location
 Cardia and fundus 10 (30.3) 10 (35.7)
 Corpus 18 (54.5) 18 (64.3)
 Antrum 5 (15.2) 5 (100)
Size (mm × mm)
 Longitudinal diameter 25.6 ± 12.8 25.8 ± 13.3 24.0 ± 10.7
 Transverse axis 19.3 ± 12.8 19.6 ± 13.7 18.1 ± 7.3
Complications
bleeding 1 (3.0) 1 (3.6) 0
Needle size
 20 gauge 30 (90.9) 26 (92.9) 4 (80)
 19 gauge 1 (3.0) 1 (3.6)
 22 gauge 1 (3.0) 1 (3.6)
 25 gauge 1 (3.0) 1 (20)
Frequency of needle passage 2.78 ± 0.88 2.79 ± 0.88 3.6 ± 0.55

SD = standard deviation, SET = subepithelial tumor.