Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 10;110(7):983–992. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01701-1

Table 3.

Functional capacity, sleepiness and quality of life (per-protocol analysis)

Baseline 6 months p value Change from baseline Between-group difference for change from baseline for APAP vs control (p value)
6MWD, m
 Control (n = 33) 409.6 ± 104.7 419.6 ± 100.4 0.566 9.3 ± 99.4 0.631
 APAP (n = 25) 406.2 ± 66.4 390.8 ± 85.0 0.170 – 15.4 ± 72.3
MLHFQ score
 Control (n = 33) 30.88 ± 18.79 29.38 ± 19.36 0.550 – 1.3 ± 18.6 0.478
 APAP (n = 25) 29.37 ± 20.14 24.00 ± 19.66 0.037 – 5.1 ± 19.4
ESS score
 Control (n = 33) 7.24 ± 3.91 7.09 ± 5.32 0.830 – 0.1 ± 4.1 0.841
 APAP (n = 25) 7.04 ± 4.15 6.78 ± 3.40 0.743 – 0.2 ± 3.6
LVEF, %
 Control (n = 33) 36.31 ± 6.91 39.23 ± 9.41 0.086 2.9 ± 7.8 0.132
 APAP (n = 25) 39.29 ± 6.51 44.35 ± 8.96 0.001 4.1 ± 7.7

Values are mean ± SD

6MWT six-minute walk test, APAP automatic positive airway pressure, ESS Epworth sleepiness scale, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, MLHFQ Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire