Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 15;9:678276. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.678276

Table 3.

Significance results of pairwise comparison.

Variables (pairwise comparisons between groups) Test statistic (χ2) P Adj P
MAJOR PROCEDURE
No procedure vs. other kidney transplantation 1,022.617 <0.01 <0.01
Diagnostic ultrasound of abdomen and retroperitoneum vs. other kidney transplantation 940.165 <0.01 <0.01
Diagnostic ultrasound of urinary vs. other kidney transplantation 908.169 <0.01 <0.01
Diagnostic ultrasound of heart vs. other kidney transplantation 889.803 <0.01 <0.01
Diagnostic ultrasound of peripheral vascular system vs. other kidney transplantation 835.000 <0.01 <0.01
No procedure vs. creation of cutaneoperitoneal fistuna 478.819 <0.01 <0.01
No procedure vs. venous catheterization for renal dialysis 452.071 <0.01 <0.01
No procedure vs. venous catheterization 445.069 <0.01 <0.01
No procedure vs. computerized axial tomography of head 433.798 <0.01 <0.01
No procedure vs. other oxygen enrichment 428.269 <0.01 <0.01
No procedure vs. computerized axial tomography of thorax 418.861 <0.01 <0.01
Diagnostic ultrasound of abdomen and retroperitoneum vs. creation of cutaneoperitoneal fistuna 396.367 <0.01 <0.01
Diagnostic ultrasound of abdomen and retroperitoneum vs. venous catheterization for renal dialysis 369.619 <0.01 <0.01
Diagnostic ultrasound of urinary vs. creation of cutaneoperitoneal fistuna 364.371 <0.01 <0.01
Diagnostic ultrasound of abdomen and retroperitoneum vs. computerized axial tomography of head 351.346 <0.01 <0.01
Diagnostic ultrasound of heart vs. creation of cutaneoperitoneal fistuna 346.005 <0.01 <0.01
Diagnostic ultrasound of urinary vs. venous catheterization for renal dialysis 337.624 <0.01 <0.01
Diagnostic ultrasound of abdomen and retroperitoneum vs. computerized axial tomography of thorax 336.409 <0.01 <0.01
No procedure vs. computerized axial tomography of abdomen 327.031 <0.01 0.01
Diagnostic ultrasound of heart vs. venous catheterization for renal dialysis 319.258 <0.01 <0.01
Diagnostic ultrasound of heart vs. computerized axial tomography of thorax 286.047 <0.01 0.04
Diagnostic ultrasound of peripheral vascular system vs. venous catheterization for renal dialysis 264.454 <0.01 0.02
Arteriovenostomy for renal dialysis vs. venous catheterization for renal dialysis 262.794 <0.01 <0.01
No procedure vs. arteriovenostomy for renal dialysis 189.277 <0.01 <0.01
Arteriovenostomy for renal dialysis vs. creation of cutaneoperitoneal fistuna −289.542 <0.01 <0.01
Revision of arteriovenous shunt for renal dialysis vs. other kidney transplantation −804.186 <0.01 <0.01
Closed (percutaneous) (needle) biopsy of kidney vs. other kidney transplantation −807.044 <0.01 <0.01
Arteriovenostomy for renal dialysis vs. other kidney transplantation −833.340 <0.01 <0.01
Hemodialysis vs. other kidney transplantation −786.375 <0.01 <0.01
Computerized axial tomography of abdomen vs. other kidney transplantation 695.586 <0.01 <0.01
Computerized axial tomography of thorax vs. other kidney transplantation 603.756 <0.01 <0.01
Other oxygen enrichment vs. other kidney transplantation 594.348 <0.01 <0.01
Computerized axial tomography of head vs. other kidney transplantation 588.819 <0.01 <0.01
Venous catheterization vs. other kidney transplantation −577.548 <0.01 <0.01
Venous catheterization for renal dialysis vs. other kidney transplantation −570.546 <0.01 <0.01
Creation of cutaneoperitoneal fistuna vs. other kidney transplantation −543.798 <0.01 <0.01
MEDICAL PAYMENT METHOD
Medical insurance vs. full self-pay −85.799 0.01 0.03
HOSPITALIZATION FREQUENCY
6 vs. 1 217.457 <0.01 0.02
LENGTH OF STAY
≤ 10 vs. 11–15 −540.129 <0.01 <0.01
≤ 10 vs. 16–20 −784.929 <0.01 <0.01
≤ 10 vs. ≥21 −960.299 <0.01 <0.01
11–15 vs. 16–20 −244.800 <0.01 <0.01
11–15 vs. ≥21 −420.169 <0.01 <0.01
16–20 vs. ≥21 −175.369 <0.01 0.01
NUMBER OF OTHER DIAGNOSIS
4 vs. 8 −177.181 <0.01 0.04
4 vs. 9 −224.115 <0.01 <0.01
4 vs. 2 258.628 <0.01 <0.01
4 vs. 10 −290.421 <0.01 <0.01
3 vs. 10 −221.126 <0.01 <0.01
6 vs. 10 −201.079 <0.01 <0.01
5 vs. 10 −167.541 <0.01 <0.01
7 vs. 10 −157.444 <0.01 0.04
NUMBER OF PROCEDURE
0 vs. ≥2 −417.254 <0.01 <0.01
1 vs. ≥2 −324.505 <0.01 <0.01

Each row tests the null hypothesis that the Sample 1 and Sample 2 distributions are the same. Asymptotic significances (two-sided tests) are displayed. The significance level is 0.05.