TABLE 1.
Different diagnostics methods for COVID-19.
| Method | Characteristics/features | Limitations/disadvantages | References |
| Antigen-detection | Low complexity; rapid; easy to perform | Best used to identify acute or early infection; more prone to false negatives | Chen et al., 2016; Diao et al., 2020; Sheridan, 2020 |
| Antibody-detection | Fast, robust and easy to perform; requiring only a small amount of sample | Unable to detect the presence of infection during the early stage of disease; cross-reactivity | Li Z. et al., 2020; Long Q.X. et al., 2020; Sheridan, 2020; Zhang et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2020a |
| RT-qPCR | Specific, sensitive and simple quantitative assay, which greatly helps in the diagnosis of early infection | Costly and time consuming to perform; more prone to false negatives or low value | Chan et al., 2020a; Corman et al., 2020; Lan et al., 2020; Wang Y. et al., 2020 |
| CT Scan | Available earlier; check severity of condition; check possible infection | Expensive; unable to distinguish from other viral pneumonias; hysteresis of abnormal CT imaging | Bernheim et al., 2020; Huang Y. et al., 2020; Li L. et al., 2020; Liu F. et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2020c |
| CRISPR-based Detection | High sensitivity and specificity with efficiency and no requirement for elaborate instrumentation | Certain biological safety hazards brought by the retention and operation of patient samples | Gootenberg et al., 2018; Abbott et al., 2020; Broughton et al., 2020; Guo et al., 2020 |