TABLE 4.

Regression analysis for professional satisfaction

Criterion	Professional satisfaction
	Standardised regression coefficients
Predictors	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4	Model 5
Gender	0.038	0.048	0.062	0.058	0.028
Age	0.028	0.013	0.087	0.074	0.056
Relationship with a partner	−0.047	−0.023	−0.022	−0.020	−0.035
Number of children	−0.020	0.023	0.068	0.068	0.072
Years of experience in the field	−0.009	−0.006	−0.053	−0.049	−0.011
Contact with COVID patients	0.052	0.061	0.004	0.007	0.010
Workload		−0.035	−0.007	0.001	0.046
Social pressure from work		−0.183**	−0.059	−0.060	−0.041
Contact with death and suffering		0.253***	0.210***	0.206***	0.131*
Fear of contagion			−0.008	−0.001	−0.016
Emotional exhaustion			−0.429***	−0.401***	−0.449***
Lack of MHPR				−0.023	0.008
Social support at work				0.053	0.009
Workload x Lack of MHPR					−0.069
Workload x Social support at work					−0.081
Social pressure from work x Lack of MHPR					−0.043
Social pressure from work x Social support at work					−0.113
Contact with death and suffering X Lack of MHPR					−0.033
Contact with death and suffering X Social support at work					0.160*
Fear of contagion x Lack of MHPR					−0.041
Fear of contagion x Social support at work					0.131*
Emotional exhaustion x Lack of MHPR					0.070
Emotional exhaustion x Social support at work					0.073
R 2	0.006	0.085	0.239	0.241	0.307
ΔR 2		0.079***	0.153***	0.003	0.066**

Gender was coded as 0 = male 1 = female; Relationship with a partner was coded as 0 = no 1 = yes; and contact with patients with COVID was coded as 0 = no 1= yes.

Abbreviation: MHPR, Material and Human Protection Resources.

^*** p < 0.001

^** p < 0.01

^* p < 0.05.