Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 30;14(6):2091–2094. doi: 10.1111/cts.13085

TABLE 1.

A comparison of clinic and remote measurements to assess COVID‐19 long‐term impact on lung function

Assessment type Clinic measurements Remote measurements Considerations
Lung X‐ray or CT scan Standard assessment for detecting lung tissue abnormalities Not applicable
Spirometry DLCO, FVC, FEV1 FVC, FEV1 Comparability between FEV1 clinic and remote measures has been demonstrated 10 ; data may be more variable due to an unsupervised test procedure
Pulse oximetry Heart rate, SpO2 Heart rate, SpO2 Pulse oximeters with regulatory clearance ensure higher quality of data; validation on people with different skin tones is lacking.
Exercise challenge tests Supervised CPET, 6MWT, 1‐min sit‐to‐stand test and the 40‐step test Unsupervised 6MWT, 1‐min sit‐to‐stand test and the 40‐step test conducted by means of wearable sensors Feasibility and patient safety should be considered carefully when deploying these tests at home

Abbreviations: 6MWT, 6‐minute walk test; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; CPET, cardiopulmonary exercise test; CT, computed tomography; DLCO, diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC, forced vital capacity; SpO2, capillary blood oxygenation.