Table 6.
hS2 Proteins | n | 0 M urea |
2 M urea |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
208 nm | 222 nm | 222/208 | 208 nm | 222 nm | 222/208 | ||
hS2Wt | 3 | −16.95 ± 0.27 | −17.63 ± 0.14 | 1.04 ± 0.01 | −16.95 ± 0.19 | −16.43 ± 0.13 | 0.97 ± 0.01¶¶¶ |
hS2R870H | 3 | −17.52 ± 0.06 | −18.18 ± 0.11 | 1.04 ± 0.002§§§ | −20.06 ± 0.04 | −17.37 ± 0.13 | 0.86 ± 0.01§§§,¶¶¶ |
hS2E924K | 3 | −16.87 ± 0.60 | −17.20 ± 0.48 | 1.02 ± 0.01§§§ | −19.56 ± 0.21 | −17.06 ± 0.16 | 0.87 ± 0.001§§§,¶¶¶ |
hS2E930Δ | 3 | −16.83 ± 0.32 | −17.26 ± 0.26 | 1.03 ± 0.004§§§ | −20.46 ± 0.03 | −15.03 ± 0.12 | 0.74 ± 0.005§§§,¶¶¶ |
Statistically significant values were calculated by one-way ANOVA calculated with Tukey’s multiple comparison test with single pooled variance. ‘n’ is equal to the number of independent experiments performed for each CD measurement. ± values are for the SEM for reported values. See Table 7 for analysis of main factors and interactions.
§p < 0.05, §§p < 0.01, §§§p < 0.001versus hS2Wt + 2M Urea.
¶p < 0.05, ¶¶p < 0.01, ¶¶¶p < 0.001 versus respective 0M Urea.