Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 29;2021(6):CD004011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004011.pub4

Summary of findings 2. Removal of short‐term indwelling urethral catheters in adults after shorter versus longer durations.

Removal of short‐term indwelling urethral catheters in adults after shorter versus longer durations
Patient or population: adults with short‐term indwelling urethral catheters that need to be removed
Setting: secondary care
Intervention: shorter durations of IUC
Comparison: longer durations of IUC
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) № of participants
(trials) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Risk with longer durations of catheterisation Risk with shorter durations of catheterisation
Number of participants requiring recatheterisation Trial population RR 1.81
(1.35 to 2.41) 5870
(44 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b  
75 per 1000 136 per 1000
(102 to 182)
Symptomatic catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI)
 
Trial population RR 0.52
(0.45 to 0.61) 5759
(41 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderatea  
126 per 1000 66 per 1000
(57 to 77)
Dysuria Trial population RR 0.42
(0.20 to 0.88) 1398
(7 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b  
118 per 1000 50 per 1000
(24 to 104)
Condition‐specific QoL or generic QoL measure Not reported
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; IUC: indwelling urethral catheter; QoL: quality of life; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngraded one level for risk of bias (unclear risk of selection bias and detection bias).
bDowngraded one level for inconsistency (heterogeneity in direction and size of effect).