Table 2.
Image format compatibility | Technical knowledge level | Customization level | Features | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Basic science image analysis | Most image formats | Moderate | High | Variety of measurement tools |
Access to image processing tools | ||||
Some automation | ||||
Slide scanner based | Limited image formats | Low | Lowmoderate | Direct access to images |
Access to common algorithms | ||||
US IVD for HER2/ER available | ||||
Pattern recognition | ||||
Batch processing | ||||
Designed for digital pathology | ||||
Digital pathology inspired | Most image formats | Moderate | Moderate | Workflow based |
Easily adjustableparameters | ||||
Batch processing | ||||
Pattern recognition | ||||
Access more feature data | ||||
Designed for digital pathology | ||||
Algorithm based | Most image formats | High | High | Fully customizable |
Unique algorithms | ||||
Even more feature data | ||||
Batch processing |
IVD: In vitro diagnostics, ER: Estrogen receptor, HER2: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2