Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 29;7:48. doi: 10.18332/tpc/136506

Table 2.

Logistic regression models for the VAS motivational test, the HMPMT and KWT

Variable OR p 95% CI
Lower limit Upper limit
Henri Mondor Paris Motivation Test (n=267)
HMPMT 1.52 <0.001 1.21 1.91
Health/decrease in symptom motivation [yes vs no (Ref.)] 60.07 0.009 2.75 1311.35
Number of previous quit attempts 3.54 0.004 1.48 8.46
Level of studies [secondary vs basic/university (Ref.)] 7.40 0.000 2.77 19.80
HMPMT × Health/decrease in symptom motivation 0.78 0.026 0.62 0.97
HMPMT × Number of previous quit attempts 0.91 0.005 0.85 0.97
Health/decrease in symptom motivation × Level of studies 0.16 0.002 0.05 0.51
Visual Analogue Scale (n=272)
Visual analogue scale 2.33 0.019 1.15 4.73
Age of initiation 1.49 0.030 1.04 2.15
Visual analogue scale × Age of initiation 0.95 0.024 0.91 0.99
Khimji-Watts Test (n=208)
KWT 0.07 0.018 0.01 0.64
Sex [male vs female (Ref.)] 142.04 0.006 4.03 5008.56
Father smokes/smoked [yes vs no (Ref.)] 3.09 0.002 1.53 6.22
Height (cm) 0.81 0.010 0.68 0.95
Number of NRT therapies (Ref.) 0.68 0.035 0.47 0.97
KWT × Sex 0.65 0.005 0.48 0.88
KWT × Height 1.02 0.012 1.00 1.03
Khimji-Watts Test (n=252), without the variable Height
KWT 1.13 0.081 0.98 1.30
Sex [male vs female (Ref.)] 7.54 0.097 0.69 82.18
Sex [male vs female (Ref.)] 1.98 0.027 1.08 3.62
Number of NRT therapies (Ref.) 0.78 0.113 0.57 1.06
KWT × Sex 0.83 0.075 0.68 1.02

OR: odds ratio.