Table 4.
Performance comparison in terms of radiomics for data #1 (minmax normalization is active).
Data features/Success rates | Accuracy | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | G-mean | Precision | F-measure |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOS | 98,33 | 98,75 | 100 | 97,50 | 98,74 | 95,24 | 97,56 |
GLCM | 93,33 | 90,94 | 83,75 | 98,13 | 90,65 | 95,71 | 89,33 |
GLRLM | 78,75 | 73,44 | 57,50 | 89,38 | 71,69 | 73,02 | 64,34 |
GLSZM | 95,00 | 94,06 | 91,25 | 96,88 | 94,02 | 93,59 | 92,41 |
FOS GLCM | 97,92 | 98,13 | 98,75 | 97,50 | 98,12 | 95,18 | 96,93 |
FOS GLRLM | 98,33 | 98,75 | 100 | 97,50 | 98,74 | 95,24 | 97,56 |
FOS GLSZM | 97,92 | 98,13 | 98,75 | 97,50 | 98,12 | 95,18 | 96,93 |
GLCM GLRLM | 91,25 | 88,44 | 80,00 | 96,88 | 88,03 | 92,75 | 85,91 |
GLCM GLSZM | 94,58 | 92,50 | 86,25 | 98,75 | 92,29 | 97,18 | 91,39 |
GLRLM GLSZM | 96,25 | 95,63 | 93,75 | 97,50 | 95,61 | 94,94 | 94,34 |
FOS GLCM GLRLM | 97,92 | 98,44 | 100 | 96,88 | 98,43 | 94,12 | 96,97 |
FOS GLCM GLSZM | 96,67 | 96,88 | 97,50 | 96,25 | 96,87 | 92,86 | 95,12 |
FOS GLRLM GLSZM | 97,92 | 97,81 | 97,50 | 98,13 | 97,81 | 96,30 | 96,89 |
GLCM GLRLM GLSZM | 96,25 | 96,56 | 97,50 | 95,63 | 96,56 | 91,76 | 94,55 |
FOS GLCM GLRLM GLSZM | 97,08 | 95,94 | 92,50 | 99,38 | 95,88 | 98,67 | 95,48 |
(Optimum results are italicized and bolded for every feature combination.)