Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 31;16(3):138–143. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2020.12.004

Table 2.

Sensitivity (%) of screening protocols according to the published studies.


Obholzer et al. (2004).
Nouraei et al. (2007).
Gimsing (2010).
Saliba et al. (2011).
Cheng and Wareing (2012).
Current study
Mean (SEM)/weighted mean
n (VS) 36 129 199 84 131a 246
AMCLASS-B 100 88 97 95 (3.6)/94
AMCLASS-A 93 93 94 93.3 (0.3)/93
Nashville 100 97 93 93 88 89 93.3 (1.9)/92
DOH 97 95 88 87 83 89 89.8 (2.1)/89
Cueva 97 81 86 91 88.8 (3.4)/88
Sunderland 97 95 93 74 83 84 87.7 (3.6)/87
Charing Cross 97 92 76 84 87 87.2 (3.7)/85
Seattle 92 91 80 92 86 80 86.8 (2.3)/84
AAO-HNS 92 90 87 72 85 (4.5)/80
Oxford 86 82 68 93 86 77 82 (3.5)/79
Rule3000 73 88 82 81 (4.4)/82
Schlauch 71 82 67 73.3 (4.5)/72
Mangham (≥5 dB) 92 (≥10 dB) 92 (≥10 dB) 87
3 × 15dB 92 83

Mean values with SEM/weighted mean.

a

Cheng and Wareing included 131 cerebellopontine angle tumors: 123 VSs and 8 meningiomas.