Table 3.
Lineage | Gene | Gene position | SLAC | FEL | FUBAR | MEME |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lineages 1–5 | C | 9 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 89.45 | 0.67 |
C | 95 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 46.73 | 0.11 | |
E | 347 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 29.06 | 0.07 | |
E | 390 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 214.78 | 0.67 | |
NS1 | 178 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 48.62 | 0.16 | |
NS2A | 171 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 88.23 | 0.04 | |
NS3 | 392 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 134.29 | 0.02 | |
NS5 | 648 | 0.03 | 0.23 | 80.97 | 0.14 | |
Indian sub-continent lineage | preM | 16 | 0.34 | 0.18 | 9.69 | 0.2 |
preM | 57 | 0.41 | 0.19 | 10.86 | 0.1 | |
E | 52 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 14.86 | 0 | |
E | 360 | 0.29 | 0.14 | 20.05 | 0.67 | |
NS1 | 192 | 0.34 | 0.19 | 9.61 | 0.01 | |
NS2A | 33 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 65.28 | 0.67 | |
NS5 | 631 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 91.78 | 0.67 |
Positive selection was evident on residues in bold font, based on the selection pressure analyses. The values shown for each method are p-values, except for the FUBAR method for which the values indicate the Bayes factor. The p-values ≤ 0.1 were considered as significant for SLAC, FEL, and MEME methods, whereas the Bayes factor ≥ 30 was used for FUBAR method. C Capsid, E envelope, NS non-structural proteins.