1. Summary of ROBINS‐I signalling questions for included cohort studies.
Author | Confounding | Selection of participants | Classification of interventions | Deviations from intended interventions | Missing data | Measurement of outcomes | Selection of reported result | Overall risk of bias |
Danquah 2019 | No | No | No | No | Probably Yesa | Probably Yesb | No | Moderate |
Helmich 2017 | No | Yesc | No | No | Probably Yesa | No | No | Moderate |
Ha 2016 | No | No | No | No | Probably Yesa | Probably Yesb | No | Moderate |
Leecaster 2016 | No | Yesd | No | Yese | Probably Yesa | Probably Yesb | No | Serious |
Mastrandrea 2015 | No | Yesd | No | Yese | Probably Yesa | Probably Yesb | No | Serious |
Smieszek 2014 | No | Yesd | No | Yese | Probably Yesa | Probably Yesb | No | Serious |
aMissing data risk will always be a serious threat in contact tracing as the true number of close contacts is rarely known. bParticipants knew they would have to report the number of close contacts throughout the study. As a result, they could possibly report differently than they would have had they not known. cStudy of successive patients over only two months, very few cases. dAs students were volunteers, their desire to participate may have biased their results. eNot all participants reported close contacts on a daily basis, and not all of those wearing devices self‐reported contacts.