Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 9;28(7):3948–3956. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.03.072

Table 1.

Effect of selected bacterial isolates on heavy metal remediation.

Cd Pb
Isolate Code Optical density Remediation % Optical density Remediation %
KE 0.562c NA 0.562c NA
EC 0.594b NA 0.594b NA
PA 0.744a NA 0.744a NA
KEA1 0.409b 36.40b 1.013b 21.36a
ECA1 0.504a 22.90c 0.544c 16.75c
PAA1 0.350c 46.49a 1.440a 20.54b
KEA2 0.409b 34.89c 1.032c 25.17b
ECA2 0.506a 37.83b 1.161a 17.58c
PAA2 0.195c 58.80a 1.093b 33.67a
KEA3 0.405c 33.67c 0.578c 17.50b
ECA3 0.515b 38.70a 0.663b 15.14c
PAA3 0.759a 37.26b 1.036a 25.99a
KEA4 0.403a 31.57b 0.891b 16.13c
ECA4 0.400a 12.52c 0.573c 25.63a
PAA4 0.206b 39.90a 1.147a 18.73b

Values in the same group followed by the same letter did not differ significantly at p < 0.05 according to Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test

KE- Klebsiella edwardsii, EC- Enterobacter cloacae

PA- Pseudomonas aeruginosa

A1- 25 mgL-1 (Cd), 150 mgL-1 (Pb)

A2- 50 mgL-1 (Cd), 300 mgL-1 (Pb)

A3- 75 mgL-1(Cd), 450 mgL-1 (Pb)

A4- 100 mgL-1(Cd), 600 mgL-1 (Pb)

NA- Not Applicable