Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 16;8:692669. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.692669

Table 3.

The C-index of HBV-related ACLF-Nomogram and different scoring systems for prediction of 90 days' survival in the derivation and validation cohorts.

Derivation cohort Validation cohort
Factor C-index (95%CI) P-value C-index (95%CI) P-value
HBV-ACLF-Nomogram 0.790
(0.773,0.807)
0.793
(0.770,0.817)
MELD 0.717
(0.697,0.736)
0.712
(0.682,0.741)
MELD-Na 0.709
(0.689,0.728)
0.715
(0.686,0.744)
CTP 0.627
(0.606,0.647)
0.629
(0.598,0.659)
CLIF-C OF 0.727
(0.701,0.754)
CLIF-C ACLF 0.746
(0.720,0.772)
COSSH ACLF 0.762
(0.737,0.787)
HBV-ACLF-Nomogram vs. MELD <0.001 <0.001
HBV-ACLF-Nomogram vs. MELD-Na <0.001 <0.001
HBV-ACLF-Nomogram vs. CTP <0.001 <0.001
HBV-ACLF-Nomogram vs. CLIF-C OF <0.001
HBV-ACLF-Nomogram vs. CLIF-C ACLF 0.001
HBV-ACLF-Nomogram vs. COSSH ACLF 0.002

C-index, concordance index; HBV, hepatitis B virus; ACLF, acute on chronic liver failure; CI, confidence interval; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; MELD-Na, model for end-stage liver disease with the addition of the Na level; CTP, child-Turcotte-Pugh; CLIF-C OF, CLIF-consortium organ failure score; CLIF-C ACLF, CLIF-consortium acute-on-chronic liver failure score; COSSH ACLF, Chinese group on the study of severe hepatitis B acute-on-chronic liver failure score.

P-values are calculated based on normal approximation using function rcorrp.cens in Hmisc package.