TABLE 3.
Two-step hierarchical regression analysis (Model 1 and 2) and separate regression containing significant predictors (Model 3) of intention to get vaccinated.
B | 95% CI | SEB | β | R2 | ΔR2 | |
Model 1 | 0.66** | 0.66** | ||||
Age | 0.01 | [0.0, 0.01] | 0.00 | 0.05* | ||
Female gender | –0.10 | [−0.24, 0.05] | 0.07 | –0.03 | ||
Attitude | 0.66 | [0.57, 0.74] | 0.04 | 0.43** | ||
Social norm Friends | 0.18 | [0.09, 0.27] | 0.05 | 0.13** | ||
Social norm Family | 0.33 | [0.24, 0.42] | 0.05 | 0.25** | ||
Perceived control (capability) | 0.14 | [0.09, 0.19] | 0.03 | 0.12** | ||
Perceived control (autonomy) | –0.06 | [−0.11, -0.01] | 0.03 | –0.04 | ||
Model 2 | 0.70** | 0.05** | ||||
Age | 0.00 | [−0.0, 0.01] | 0.00 | 0.02 | ||
Female gender | –0.13 | [−0.27, 0.01] | 0.07 | –0.03 | ||
Attitude | 0.47 | [0.38, 0.55] | 0.04 | 0.30** | ||
Social norm Friends | 0.11 | [0.03, 0.20] | 0.04 | 0.08 | ||
Social norm Family | 0.23 | [0.15, 0.32] | 0.04 | 0.17** | ||
Perceived control (capability) | 0.09 | [0.04, 0.14] | 0.03 | 0.08** | ||
Perceived control (autonomy) | –0.03 | [−0.08, 0.02] | 0.03 | –0.02 | ||
Relative susceptibility | 0.06 | [−0.00, 0.12] | 0.03 | 0.04 | ||
Relative seriousness | 0.03 | [−0.02, 0.09] | 0.03 | 0.03 | ||
Anticipated regret vaccination | –0.16 | [−0.22, -0.11] | 0.03 | −0.14** | ||
Anticipated regret no vaccination | 0.26 | [0.20, 0.32] | 0.03 | 0.22** | ||
Model 3 | 0.69** | |||||
Attitude | 0.48 | [0.40, 0.57] | 0.04 | 0.31** | ||
Social norm Family | 0.31 | [0.24, 0.38] | 0.04 | 0.23** | ||
Perceived control (capability) | 0.11 | [0.06, 0.16] | 0.03 | 0.09** | ||
Net anticipated regret (no vaccination – vaccination) | 0.22 | [0.18, 0.25] | 0.02 | 0.32** |
*p < 0.01, **p < 0.001.