Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 16;9:585715. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.585715

Table 3.

Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with having a high Digital Overuse and Addiction Traits (DOAT) score.

Failed to cut down Restless when stopped using Negative impact on home/social Negative impact on work* Higher DOAT
P AOR (95% CI) P AOR (95% CI) P AOR (95% CI) P AOR (95% CI) P AOR (95% CI)
Lower mental well-being (Ref = No) Yes 0.198 1.35 (0.86–2.12) 0.003 2.14 (1.29–3.57) 0.403 1.31 (0.69–2.50) 0.014 2.25 (1.18–4.31) 0.003 2.15 (1.30–3.55)
Social media use Tertiles (Ref) Low 0.013 0.013 0.712 0.667 0.032
Moderate 0.192 1.39 (0.85–2.26) 0.028 2.04 (1.08–3.84) 0.919 1.04 (0.48–2.27) 0.422 1.38 (0.63–3.04) 0.373 1.32 (0.72–2.45)
High 0.005 2.11 (1.25–3.56) 0.003 2.80 (1.41–5.56) 0.517 1.31 (0.58–2.93) 0.774 1.13 (0.48–2.66) 0.018 2.17 (1.14–4.14)
Internet access frequency Tertiles (Ref) Low 0.013 0.223 0.246 0.077 0.002
Moderate 0.499 1.15 (0.77–1.72) 0.785 1.07 (0.66–1.75) 0.318 0.73 (0.39–1.36) 0.282 1.45 (0.74–2.83) 0.513 1.18 (0.72–1.94)
High 0.005 1.91 (1.21–3.01) 0.109 1.57 (0.90–2.74) 0.491 1.27 (0.64–2.51) 0.025 2.29 (1.11–4.73) 0.001 2.44 (1.42–4.17)
Current smoker (Ref = No) Yes 0.526 1.15 (0.74–1.78) 0.712 1.11 (0.65–1.88) 0.251 1.43 (0.78–2.65) 0.817 1.09 (0.53–2.23) 0.512 1.19 (0.71–1.98)
Binge drinker (Ref = No) Yes 0.761 1.07 (0.70–1.64) 0.220 1.36 (0.83–2.24) 0.574 1.20 (0.64–2.22) 0.667 1.15 (0.61–2.18) 0.397 1.24 (0.76–2.03)
Age (years) 18–29 <0.001 4.15 (2.07–8.34) 0.076 2.02 (0.93–4.40) 0.001 7.80 (2.27–26.86) 0.018 4.08 (1.28–13.02) 0.012 2.94 (1.27–6.85)
30–39 <0.001 4.22 (2.18–8.16) 0.548 1.26 (0.60–2.66) <0.001 9.27 (2.83–30.41) 0.086 2.70 (0.87–8.37) 0.007 2.97 (1.34–6.60)
40–49 <0.001 4.38 (2.30–8.33) 0.619 1.21 (0.57–2.56) 0.003 5.98 (1.83–19.54) 0.040 3.18 (1.05–9.58) 0.018 2.62 (118–5.79)
50–59 0.085 1.84 (0.92–3.67) 0.678 0.84 (0.38–1.89) 0.937 1.07 (0.23–4.99) 0.992 0.99 (0.27–3.67) 0.706 1.19 (0.49–2.89)
60+ (Ref) <0.001 0.148 <0.001 0.035 0.018
Gender (Ref = Male) Female 0.054 1.40 (0.99–1.96) 0.080 1.45 (0.96–2.19) 0.575 1.16 (0.69–1.96) 0.080 0.62 (0.37–1.06) 0.522 1.14 (0.76–1.70)
Deprivation (Ref) Poor 1 0.877 0.431 0.469 0.673 0.119
2 0.779 0.93 (0.55–1.56) 0.088 0.57 (0.30–1.09) 0.304 0.66 (0.29–1.47) 0.431 0.70 (0.29–1.69) 0.020 0.47 (0.25–0.89)
3 0.363 0.77 (0.44–1.35) 0.297 0.71 (0.37–1.36) 0.380 0.68 (0.29–1.60) 0.841 1.09 (0.47–2.54) 0.110 0.59 (0.31–1.13)
4 0.808 0.93 (0.54–1.62) 0.860 0.94 (0.50–1.79) 0.610 1.23 (0.56–2.68) 0.529 1.31 (0.57–2.99) 0.771 0.91 (0.49–1.69)
Affluent 5 0.933 1.02 (0.59–1.77) 0.653 0.87 (0.46–1.63) 0.797 1.11 (0.50–2.48) 0.582 1.26 (0.55–2.87) 0.274 0.71 (0.38–1.32)
Rurality (Ref = Rural) Urban 0.884 0.97 (0.64–1.47) 0.978 1.01 (0.60–1.69) 0.577 0.84 (0.44–1.58) 0.279 1.53 (0.71–3.29) 0.619 1.14 (0.67–1.94)
Health Board Sampling Strata£ 0.019 0.297 0.395 0.669 0.095

DOAT, Digital Overuse and Addiction Traits score; AOR, Adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; Ref, Reference category.

*

Work excludes those who are neither in employment or students (n = 61).

Higher DOAT (Digital Overuse and Addiction Traits) score is calculated as one standard deviation or more above the sample mean (see methods).

£

Overall P-values for the variable health board sampling strata are shown but P-values for each individual sampling area are not included in order to limit table size.