Table 5.
Reader 2 |
Reader 3 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<40% | 40–50% | >50% | <40% | 40–50% | >50% | ||
DL predict | <40% | 30 | 3 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 1 |
40–50% | 0 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 1 | |
>50% | 0 | 9 | 91 | 2 | 15 | 83 |
The classification of EF into <40%, 40–50%, and >50% with the DL approach agreed with visual prediction in 88.9% and 80.5% of cases for Reader 2 and 3, respectively.