Skip to main content
. 2021 May 24;10(2):84–88. doi: 10.34172/jcs.2021.016

Table 2. Comparing the frequency of time and type of PICs patency in the two groups .

Groups N Time (h) P value
Continuous flushing (CF) 0.22
12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96
Open 36 36(100) 36(100) 36(100) 32(88.9) 32(88.9) 28(77.78) 28(77.78) 12(33.33)
Partial open 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (2.8) 1 (2.8) 4(11.11) 4(11.11) 20(55.56)
Occlusion 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (8.3) 3 (8.3) 4(11.11) 4(11.11) 4(11.11)
Pulsatile flushing (PF)
Open 35 35(100) 35(100) 35(100) 31(88.58) 31(88.58) 29(82.87) 29(82.87) 19 (54.28)
Partial open 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (8.57) 3 (8.57) 5 (14.28) 5 (14.28) 13 (37.15)
Occlusion 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (2.85) 1 (2.85) 1 (2.85) 1 (2.85) 3 (8.57)

Fisher’s exact test