. 2021 Jun 18;32(2):185–193. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12843

TABLE 2.

Intercorrelations between Λ T0‐T1 variables studied (physical activity, social activity, daytime social networking use, night‐time social networking use, CERM, CERI, Anxiety state, Bruxism Index, and Self‐reported Bruxism Scale)

	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
∆ Physical activity	0.129	−0.013	−0.47	0.004	0.033	−0.013	−0.105	−0.110
∆ Social activity		0.205 ^a	−0.097	0.067	0.155 ^b	0.123	0.121	−0.043
∆ Use of daytime social networks			0.102	0.403 ^a	0.011	0.635 ^a	0.559 ^a	0.366 ^a
∆ Use of social networks at night				0.322 ^b	0.067	0.108	0.246 ^a	0.553 ^a
∆ CERM					0.182 ^a	0.371 ^a	0.384 ^a	0.502 ^a
∆ CERI						−0.003	0.002	0.052
∆ Anxiety state							0.477 ^a	0.467 ^a
∆ Bruxism index								0.493 ^a
∆ Self‐reported Bruxism Scale

N = 213.

∆: change T0‐T1.

^{^a}

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.

^{^b}

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.