Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 8;36(4):853–862. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10687

TABLE 4.

Comparison of baseline study population and nutrition characteristics between patients with detectable (positive) and undetectable (negative) AAT result

Characteristic a Undetectable (n = 11) Detectable (n = 9) P‐value b , c
Age, years 42 (34–68) 60 (51–67.5) .33
Male, n (%) 9 (82) 4 (44) .16
BMI 35.7 (34.8–38.2) 34.4 (27.5–37.4) .3
Days since hospital admission 10 (10–24) 12 (7.5–24) .94
SOFA score 9 (7–13) 8 (5.5–10) .23
Mechanical ventilation, n (%) 10 (91) 8 (89) 1
Supine position, n (%) 8 (73) 5 (56) .64
Receiving paralytic, n (%) 3 (27) 4 (44) .64
Receiving enteral nutrition at 24 h, n (%) 7 (64) 8 (89) .32
Volume of TF administered in prior 24 h (ml) 160 (20–250) 250 (27.5–807.5) .46
NGT output in prior 24 h (ml) 150 (0–500) 200 (0–437.5) .66
Stool volume in prior 24 h (ml) 350 (150–1100) 475 (0–1095) .9
Time of AAT (min) 74 (63–90) 86 (40.5–91) .88

Note: BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

Abbreviations: AAT, acetaminophen absorption test; BMI, body mass index; NGT, nasogastric tube; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; TF, tube feeds.

a

Data presented as median (interquartile range), unless otherwise stated.

b

Nonparametric data analyzed using Mann‐Whitney U test.

c

Categorical data analyzed using Fisher exact test.