Skip to main content
. 2021 May 31;93(9):5650–5654. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27089

Table 1.

Diagnostic performance of the evaluated Ag‐RDTs according to viral load

Type of sample C t values Panbio SD‐Biosensor p value
PCR negative N/A Positive samples 0/186 Positive samples 5/186 0.063
Specificity 100.0 Specificity 97.3
(n = 186)
(93.8–99.1)
(98.0 – 100.0)
PCR positive 25.2 (20.2– 29.7) Positive samples 102/170 Positive samples 113/170 0.003
Sensitivity 60.0 Sensitivity 66.5
(n = 170) (52.2 – 67.4) (58.8–73.5)
High viral load samples
C t 20 17.8 (16.8– 18.5) Positive samples 41/41 Positive samples 41/41 1.000
Sensitivity 100.0 Sensitivity 100.0
(n = 41) (91.4 – 100.0)
(91.4–100.0)
C t = 20–25 22.1 (20.8– 23.6) Positive samples 40/43 Positive samples 41/43 1.000
Sensitivity 93.0 Sensitivity 95.3
(n = 43) (80.9 – 98.5) (84.2–99.4)
Low viral load samples
C t = 25–30 27.2 (26.0– 28.7) Positive samples 19/46 Positive samples 24/46 0.125
Sensitivity 41.3 Sensitivity 52.2
(n = 46) (27.0 – 56.8) (36.9–67.1)
C t > 30 31.3 (30.6 – 33.3) Positive samples 2/40 Positive samples 7/40 0.063
(n = 40) Sensitivity 5.0 Sensitivity 17.5
(7.3–32.8)
(0.6 – 16.9)

Note: Statistics: values are expressed as absolute count (percentage) and median (interquartile range). Sensitivity and specificity results are expressed as percentage with 95% CI. P‐values were calculated by the McNemar's test. Significant differences are shown in bold.

Abbreviations: Ag‐RDT, antigen rapid diagnostic test; C t, cycle threshold; N/A, not applicable; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; p‐value, level of significance.