Table 1.
Evaluation of Qingliu resistance to N. lugens using SSST and MSST
| Standard seedbox screening test (SSST) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variety | Mudgo | Qingliu | H105 | TN1 | TNG67 | Baiqiaowan |
| Damage score | 5.0 ± 0.0c | 5.0 ± 0.0c | 5.0 ± 0.0c | 8.3 ± 1.2a | 7.0 ± 0.0b | 9.0 ± 0.0a |
| p-value | 2.37E-07 | |||||
| Modified seedbox screening test (MSST) | ||||||
| Variety | Mudgo | Qingliu | H105 | TN1 | TNG67 | Baiqiaowan |
| Damage score | 5.0 ± 0.0c | 5.0 ± 0.0c | 5.7 ± 1.2bc | 7.0 ± 0.0ab | 8.3 ± 1.2a | 8.3 ± 1.2a |
| p-value | 0.000388 | |||||
Two BPH-moderately resistant checks: Mudgo and H105. Two BPH-susceptible checks: TN1 and TNG67. The average damage score ± SD from three experimental repeats was analyzed with two-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc test with different letters denoting a significant difference (p < 0.05)