Skip to main content
. 2021 May 29;14(5):1371–1379. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.1371-1379

Table-5.

Internal and external egg quality characteristics influenced by different treatments.

Treatment group Cu level (%) of requirement Cu source Shape index Albumen index Yolk index Haugh unit score Shell thickness (mm) Yolk fat content (%) dry matter basis Yolk color score
T1 100 Inorganic 74.46± 0.52b 0.10± 0.00 0.44± 0.01 86.42± 0.56a 0.32± 0.00a 59.49± 0.99 7.28± 0.11
T2 100 Organic 75.27± 0.42b 0.10± 0.00 0.43± 0.01 84.02± 0.54ab 0.34± 0.00b 57.94± 1.89 7.33± 0.10
T3 75 Organic 74.46± 0.41b 0.09± 0.00 0.42± 0.01 84.41± 0.54ab 0.34± 0.00b 58.25± 1.54 7.31± 0.09
T4 50 Organic 73.65± 0.94ab 0.10± 0.00 0.43± 0.00 85.12± 0.56ab 0.33± 0.00ab 59.01± 0.60 7.17± 0.10
T5 75 Nanoparticles 73.19± 0.34ab 0.09± 0.00 0.43± 0.00 82.79± 0.58b 0.36± 0.00c 59.05± 0.89 7.16± 0.09
T6 50 Nanoparticles 70.35± 1.45a 0.10± 0.0 0.44± 0.01 85.96± 1.00a 0.34± 0.00b 59.78± 3.30 7.34± 0.98
T7 25 Nanoparticles 74.06±0.92b 0.09± 0.00 0.43± 0.01 85.20± 0.65ab 0.34± 0.00ab 59.57± 2.98 7.31± 0.93
SEM 3.869 0.017 0.024 3.128 0.017 2.136 0.483
p-value <0.001 0.068 0.842 0.002 <0.001 0.993 0.792

Mean values bearing different superscripts within the column differ significantly (p<0.05) , Cu=Copper, FCR=Feed conversion ratio