Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 19;113(6):1578–1592. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab002

TABLE 1.

General characteristics of systematic reviews1

Reviews (n = 150)
Journal
 General nutrition journal (journals with only a nutrition focus, e.g., The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition) 61 (40.7)
 Specialized nutrition journal (journals with a focus on nutrition and a specific disease area, e.g., Nutrition,Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases) 7 (4.7)
 General medical journal (e.g., Lancet) 28 (18.7)
 Specialized medical journal (e.g., Clinical Breast Cancer) 54 (36.0)
Country of primary affiliation of corresponding author
 North America 14 (9.3)
 Europe 43 (28.7)
 Oceania 13 (8.7)
 Middle East 28 (18.7)
 Asia 49 (32.7)
 South America 3 (0.7)
Was the review conducted to inform a particular guideline or policy decision or to fulfill the needs of a particular evidence user?
 Yes 6 (4.0)
 No 144 (96.0)
Funding2
 Government support 56 (37.3)
 Institutional support 34 (22.7)
 Private not-for-profit foundation 20 (13.3)
 Food marketing/advocacy organizations 4 (2.7)
 Food companies 2 (1.3)
 No funding 32 (21.3)
 Not reported 34 (22.7)
Did the authors declare any conflicts of interest?
 Yes 10 (6.7)
 No 135 (90.0)
 Not reported 5 (3.3)
Exposures2
 Micronutrient 27 (18.0)
 Macronutrient 24 (16.0)
 Bioactive compounds 15 (10.0)
 Food or beverage 60 (40.0)
 Food group 21 (14.0)
 Dietary pattern 49 (32.7)
 Nonnutritive components of foods/beverages 25 (18.7)
Outcomes2
 Cardiometabolic morbidity or mortality 26 (17.3)
 Cancer morbidity or mortality 54 (36.0)
 Diseases of the digestive system 10 (6.7)
 All-cause mortality 9 (6.0)
 Anthropometric measures 8 (5.3)
 Surrogate outcomes 17 (11.3)
 Other 55 (36.7)
Primary studies, n 15 [11–23]
Participants, n 208,117 [84,951–510,954]
1

Values are n (%) or median [IQR].

2

Each review can be classified in >1 category.