Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 30;5:100060. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100060

Table 2.

Information included within the escalation protocols.

Low risk Medium risk High risk All risk categories
Urgency of clinical response
All charts 10/142 (7.0) 82/147 (55.8) 64/124 (51.6) 8/147 (5.4)
Colour-coded 5/97 (5.2) 53/97 (54.6) 25/76 (32.9) 2/97 (2.1)
Aggregate-weighted 5/45 (11.1) 29/50 (58.0) 39/48 (81.3) 6/50 (12.0)
Seniority of responder
All charts 74/141 (52.5) 112/147 (76.2) 94/124 (75.8) 76/147 (51.7)
Colour-coded 38/97 (39.2) 67/97 (69.1) 47/76 (61.8) 38/97 (39.2)
Aggregate-weighted 36/44 (81.8) 45/50 (90.0) 47/48 (97.9) 38/50 (76.0)
Frequency of on-going clinical monitoring
All charts 60/142 (42.3) 64/147 (43.5) 41/124 (33.1) 37/147 (25.2)
Colour-coded 23/97 (23.7) 27/97 (27.8) 12/76 (15.8) 11/97 (11.3)
Aggregate-weighted 37/45 (82.2) 37/50 (74.0) 29/48 (60.4) 26/50 (52.0)
Recommended clinical setting of care
All charts 2/141 (1.4) 23/146 (15.8) 57/123 (46.3) 2/147 (1.4)
Colour-coded 0/96 (0) 10/96 (10.4) 25/75 (33.3) 0/97 (0)
Aggregate-weighted 2/45 (4.4) 12/50 (26.0) 32/48 (66.7) 2/50 (4.0)

Data presented as number (%). Where denominators do not add up to 147 (all charts), 97 (colour-coded) or 50 (aggregate-weighted), these charts did not include that specific risk category in their escalation protocol.