Table 5. ANOVA comparison for IR, VFA at 3 T.
T1,NMR (ms) | Vendor– 3 T | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IR | VFA | |||||
C v. D | C v. E | D v. E | C v. D | C v. E | D v. E | |
2033 | 0.9970 | 0.0056 | 0.0109 | 0.0119 | 0.9712 | 0.0061 |
1489 | 0.9980 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0166 | 0.8883 | 0.0055 |
1012 | 0.4999 | 0.0056 | 0.0008 | 0.0106 | 0.8952 | 0.0036 |
731 | 0.6117 | 0.3649 | 0.0828 | 0.0037 | 0.9552 | 0.0017 |
514 | 0.7037 | 0.0646 | 0.0163 | 0.0012 | 0.9984 | 0.0008 |
368 | 0.9247 | 0.0299 | 0.0184 | 0.0007 | 0.9600 | 0.0003 |
260 | 0.5113 | 0.0201 | 0.2208 | 0.0031 | 0.7508 | 0.0006 |
185 | 0.0637 | 0.0628 | 0.9783 | 0.0271 | 0.5641 | 0.0031 |
133 | 0.3646 | 0.0401 | 0.5122 | 0.2006 | 0.3089 | 0.0123 |
93 | 0.1293 | 0.0001 | 0.0163 | 0.4240 | 0.1926 | 0.0199 |
65 | 0.8806 | 0.0178 | 0.0628 | 0.2636 | 0.3983 | 0.0251 |
46 | 0.9795 | 0.1217 | 0.2024 | 0.3201 | 0.6593 | 0.0741 |
32 | 0.8823 | 0.3176 | 0.1665 | 0.0505 | 0.8880 | 0.0180 |
23 | 0.8240 | 0.2355 | 0.6464 | 0.0064 | 0.9861 | 0.0037 |
p-value for ANOVA comparison with 95% confidence interval testing for IR, VFA differences between vendors at 3 T, considering each T1,NMR value individually.