Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep;2(9):e461–e471. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00143-9

Table 3.

Sensitivity comparisons of two commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests on B.1.1.7 samples vs samples from April and September 2020

Innova
SureScreen-V
Number of samples Sensitivity vs RT-rtPCR (95% CI) p value* Number of samples Sensitivity vs RT-rtPCR (95% CI) p value*
B.1.1.7
Overall 23 78·3% (58·1–90·3) .. 23 65·2% (44·9–81·2) ..
N Ct value <25 16 100·0% (80·6–100) .. 16 87·5% (64·0–97·8) ..
April, 2020
Overall 23 82·6% (62·9–93·0) 1·0 23 60·9% (40·8–77·8) 1·0
N Ct value <25 16 100·0% (80·6–100) 1·0 16 81·2% (57·0–93·4) 1·0
September, 2020
Overall 23 82·6% (62·9–93·0) 1·0 23 73·9% (53·5–87·4) 0·75
N Ct value <25 16 100·0% (80·6–100·0) 1·0 16 100·0% (80·6–100·0) 0·48

RT-rtPCR=quantitative RT-PCR. N=SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid. Ct=cycle threshold. SureScreen-V=SureScreen visual.

*

Two-tailed p values were determined for the comparison of sensitivities between the B.1.1.7 samples (December, 2020, and January, 2021) and earlier samples (assumed to be non-B.1.1.7) with Fischer's exact test.