Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 11;7(2):481–487. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2020.09.005

Table 4.

Effects of Mn-MHAC on growth performance from d 10 to 45.1

Item Dietary treatment
SEM P-value Polynomial contrasts, P-value
Control (0 mg Mn/kg) Mn sulfate (100 mg Mn/kg) Mn-MHAC (25 mg Mn/kg) Mn-MHAC (50 mg Mn/kg) Mn-MHAC (75 mg Mn/kg) Mn-MHAC (100 mg Mn/kg) Mn-MHAC linear Mn-MHAC quadratic
BW2, kg 1.86c 2.02ab 1.94bc 2.07a 1.99b 1.96b 0.015 <0.001 0.940 0.017
ADFI3, g 88.04b 94.09b 91.13b 100.44a 89.99b 92.47b 0.982 0.002 0.926 0.114
ADG4, g 47.75c 52.17ab 49.87bc 53.91a 51.40b 50.50b 0.452 <0.001 0.940 0.017
F:G, g/g 1.85 1.80 1.83 1.80 1.79 1.83 0.015 0.308 0.994 0.186
Mortality 6.94 5.56 9.72 6.94 11.11 5.56 1.344 0.815 0.653 0.876

Mn-MHAC = manganese methionine hydroxy analog chelated; BW = body weight; ADG = average daily gain; ADFI = average daily feed intake; F:G = feed-to-gain ratio.

a, b, c Values in the same row with different superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05) by one-way ANOVA.

1

Data are means of 6 replicates of 12 broilers per dietary treatment.

2

BW Regression equation: y = −4.880x2 + 0.006x + 1.856, R2 = 0.441.

3

ADFI Regression equation: y = −0.002x2 + 0.271x + 87.874, R2 = 0.193.

4

ADG Regression equation: y = −0.001x2 + 0.172x + 47.485, R2 = 0.441.