Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 22;7(2):295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2020.11.012

Table 3.

Effects of gut microbiota on the blood routine indices in a pig model.1

Item Groups2
P-value
CV GF FMT
WBC, 109/L 19.79 ± 2.19a 7.63 ± 0.32b 8.95 ± 0.34b <0.01
NEUT, 109/L 7.59 ± 1.33a 2.05 ± 0.36b 4.16 ± 0.37b <0.01
LY, 109/L 10.47 ± 0.86a 4.22 ± 0.83b 3.96 ± 0.23b <0.01
MON, 109/L 1.15 ± 0.23 1.11 ± 0.72 0.59 ± 0.04 0.64
EOS, 109/L 0.38 ± 0.09a 0.10 ± 0.02b 0.15 ± 0.02b <0.01
BAS, 109/L 0.20 ± 0.03a 0.09 ± 0.01b 0.09 ± 0.02b <0.01
RBC, 1012/L 6.30 ± 0.14 6.68 ± 0.24 6.71 ± 0.21 0.25
HBC, g/L 120.67 ± 3.58 121.25 ± 4.63 119.83 ± 3.50 0.96
PLT, 109/L 560.42 ± 31.76 588.58 ± 44.52 560.75 ± 35.83 0.87

WBC = white blood cell; NEUT = neutrophils; LY = lymphocyte; MON = monocyte; EOS = eosinophils; BAS = basophilic granulocyte; RBC = red blood cell; HBC = hemoglobin concentration; PLT = platelet.

a, b Labeled means with different superscripts within a row are significantly different at P < 0.05.

1

Values are means ± SEM, n = 6/group.

2

CV, conventional piglets; GF, germ-free piglets; FMT, germ-free piglets were transplanted with healthy sow fecal microbiota.