Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 30;4(6):e2115321. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15321

Table 3. Possible Triage Outcomes With Expedited Retesting for a Woman With CIN Grade 2 or 3.

Triage type Probability, % (95% CI) Outcome Time to CIN grade 2 or 3 detection
Initial screening (HPV/LBC triage), HPV- and CIN grade 2 or 3–cytology positive 71.5 (63.1-78.4) Colposcopy Immediate
HPV detected, CIN grade 2 or 3–cytology negative 23.2 (16.4-31.6) Expedited retest Expedited test dependent
HPV missed, no cytology triagea 5.3 (NA) False negative Next screening cycle at earliest
HPV-only expedited retest; HPV detecteda 94.7 (NA) Colposcopy 6-18 mos after initial screening
Probability of missing CIN grade 2 or 3 after retest 1.2 (0.9-1.7) NA NA
LBC-only expedited retest; CIN grade 2 or 3 detected 75.5 (66.6-82.7) Colposcopy 6-18 mos after initial screening
CIN grade 2 or 3 missed 24.5 (17.3-33.4) False negative Next screening cycle at earliest
Probability of missing CIN grade 2 or 3 after retest 5.7 (2.8-10.6) NA NA
HPV and LBC expedited retest; either HPV or CIN grade 2or 3 detected 98.7 (98.2-99.1) Colposcopy 6-18 mos after initial
Both HPV and CIN grade 2 or 3 missed 1.3 (0.9-1.8) False negative Next screening cycle at earliest
Probability of missing CIN grade 2 or 3 after retest 0.3 (0.2-0.6) NA NA

Abbreviations: CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; HPV, human papillomavirus; LBC, liquid-based cytology; NA, not applicable.

a

Probabilities inferred from high-risk HPV test sensitivity value, as derived in eAppendix in the Supplement.