Table 4.

Number and proportion of child consultation steps correctly performed by HEW with Rad‐G after training (observation 1) and after 2 months of routine use (observation 2)

	Consultation steps	Observation 1 (after training)			Observation 2 (after 2 months)
		n	%	95% CI	n	%	95% CI
1	Child calm before Rad‐G attempt	224	84.8	79.9, 88.7	248	95.8	92.5, 97.6
2	Correct mode selected	264	100.0	98.6, 1.0	258	99.6	97.3, 99.9
3	Correct age group	237	89.8	85.4, 92.9	246	95.0	91.5, 97.1
4	Correct probe position	253	95.8	92.6, 97.7	258	99.6	97.3, 99.9
5	Correct probe direction	257	97.3	94.5, 98.7	254	98.1	95.4, 99.2
6	Child not eating/feeding during Rad‐G attempt	244	92.4	88.5, 95.1	257	99.2	96.9, 99.8
7	Child calm during Rad‐G attempt	249	94.3	90.8, 96.6	251	96.9	93.9, 98.5
1–7	Cumulative assessment (steps 1–7)	180	68.2	62.3, 73.6	227	87.6	83.0, 91.1
1–7: Denominator = Children who were assessed (assessment started)		264			259
8	Correct classification using Rad‐G	183	93.8	89.4, 96.5	229	96.2	92.9, 98.0
1–8	Correct assessment and classification (steps 1–8) – primary outcome	149	76.4	69.9, 81.9	203	85.3	80.2, 89.3
9	Correct treatment and referral guidance using Rad‐G classification and HEW's assessment of other symptoms (yes/no?)	185	94.9	90.7, 97.2	228	95.8	92.3, 97.7
Denominator = Children with RR and SpO2SpO2 classification (Rad‐G)		195			238
	Intention to treat
8	Correct classification using Rad‐G	183	69.3	63.5, 74.6	229	88.4	83.9, 91.8
1–8	Correct assessment and classification (steps 1–8) – primary outcome	149	56.4	50.4, 62.3	203	78.4	72.9, 83.0
	Further analysis
2, 4, 5	Manufacturer instructions for use correctly performed (steps 2, 4, 5)	248	93.9	90.3, 96.3	252	97.3	94.4, 98.7
1–3, 6–8	Adherence to WHO requirements to assess fast breathing (steps 1, 3, 6, 7, 8)	151	57.2	51.1, 63.1	208	80.3	75.0, 84.7
Denominator = Children who were assessed (assessment started)		264			259