Table 1.
Reference (first author; year) | Setting | Measure(s) of neighbourhood environment | Format of physical activity intervention | Intervention content | Physical activity measurement | Valence of environmental influence on intervention effect | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Perceived | Objective | Instructor-led | Self-directed | Self-report | Device-based | Augmenting | Overcoming | No effect | |||
King (2006) [12] | 5 US metropolitan areas | √ | √ | Combined 3 different physical activity trials with varying interventions (e.g., telephone-based counseling, peer group support, culturally tailored self-help) | √ | √ | |||||
King (2006) [13] | Primary care facilities in 3 US metropolitan areas | √ | √ | 3 intervention arms within the Activity Counseling Trial (physician counseling alone, physician counseling plus monthly print materials, physician counseling plus health educator telephone counseling) | √ | √ | |||||
Sallis (2007) [68] | Primary care facilities in 3 US metropolitan areas | √ | √ | 3 intervention arms within the Activity Counseling Trial (see above for details) | √ | √ | |||||
Zenk (2009) [69] | Urban and suburban areas in and around Chicago, IL (USA) | √ | √ | 12-month walking intervention for women in predominantly African-American communities | √ | √ | √ | ||||
Michael (2009) [11] | Portland, OR (USA) | √ | √ | 6-month lay-led neighbourhood-based walking groups | √ | √ | |||||
Merom (2009) [70] | New South Wales (Australia) | √ | √ | Self-help walking program with weekly diaries with or without pedometers | √ | √ | √ | ||||
Kerr (2010) [14] | Urban and suburban areas in San Diego County, CA (USA) | √ | √ | √ | Self-help walking program with weekly diaries with or without pedometers | √ | √ | ||||
Gebel (2011) [71] | Wheeling and Parkersburg, WV (USA) | √ | √ | Population-wide mass media intervention | √ | √ | |||||
Lee (2012) [72] | Houston and Austin, TX (USA) | √ | √ | 6-month group cohesion intervention to promote walking among African-American and Hispanic/Latino women | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
Barnes (2013) [73] | Perth metropolitan area (Australia) | √ | √ | Television mass media campaign promoting 30 min of daily physical activity | √ | √ | |||||
King (2017) [74] | 4 US metropolitan areas | √ | √ | Center- and home-based physical activity intervention among older adults | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
Jilcott Pitts (2017) [75] | Lenoir County in rural eastern NC (USA) | √ | √ | √ | Four monthly lifestyle counseling sessions, including PA promotion | √ | √ | √ | |||
Perez (2018) [76] | San Diego County, CA (USA) | √ | √ | 12 months of promotoras-led exercise classes at or near churches and PA promotion provided to Latino women | √ | √ | √ | ||||
Lo (2019 )[77] | Rural towns in MT and NY (USA) | √ | √ | √ | 6 months of exercise classes, skills building, and field-based learning provided to women in rural communities | √ | √ | √ |
Note: Instructor-led interventions included some component of structured or organized sessions in which participants engaged in physical activity together led by the intervention team; self-directed interventions included physical activity promotion in various formats (e.g., telephone, web-based, in-person) but did not include structured or organized sessions; see text for description of valence of results