Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 5;154(1):85–91. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13517

TABLE 3.

Multiple logistic regression of potential determinants of OGTT testing among women with an increased risk with whom an OGTT was discussed

Determinants No. of participants No. with OGTT performed, n (%; 95% CI) Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR a (95% CI)
All 292 226 (77; 72–82)
Predicted GDM risk (%) 1.11 (1.05–1.20) 1.10 (1.04–1.18)
Polycystic ovarian syndrome
Yes 24 15 (62; 43–79) 0.45 (0.19–1.12) 0.36 (0.13–1.00)
No 268 211 (79; 73–83) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Educational level
Primary or secondary 132 108 (82; 74–87) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Tertiary 160 118 (74; 66–80) 0.62 (0.35–1.09) 0.79 (0.43–1.43)
Concerns regarding GDM 1.32 (0.98–1.80) 1.21 (0.87–1.70)
Concerns regarding macrosomia 0.97 (0.68–1.42) 0.89 (0.60–1.35)
Counseling of GDM risk
by midwife 201 152 (76; 69–81) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
by obstetrician 91 74 (81; 72–88) 1.40 (0.77–2.66) 1.50 (0.77–3.08)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; OR odds ratio.

a

Odds ratios adjusted for variables listed in left column.