Date	Event	Description
17 April 2013	New citation required but conclusions have not changed	Despite the addition of 11 further trials, the key conclusions of this review have not changed greatly since the 2006 version: The effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation for reducing the disabling effects of neglect and increasing independence remains unproven. No rehabilitation approach can be supported or refuted from current randomised controlled trials
23 September 2012	New search has been performed	We added 11 new trials to the 12 trials that we included in the previous version. Twenty‐three trials (628 participants) are now included. We have rewritten the Discussion section using standard Cochrane sub‐headings. We have expanded the outcomes: previous versions of the review had functional disability, neglect assessments, and discharge destination as outcomes. For this update, we added a number of secondary outcomes that had been identified as important to stroke survivors. This brings this review in line with other reviews of visual problems after stroke. We have changed the comparisons: for this version of the review, we changed the presentation of statistical comparisons. In particular, we amended the sub‐group comparisons of bottom‐up and top‐down approaches, so that analyses included sub‐groups of types of treatment
4 August 2008	Amended	Converted to new review format
26 April 2006	New search has been performed	For this updated review, we excluded several previously included non‐randomised trials to reduce bias. We added several new, or newly identified, randomised controlled trials (RCTs), resulting in a review of 306 participants from 12 RCTs