Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 17;11:627282. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.627282

Table 4.

Effect of kV imaging on pain reduction by fraction number, disease site, and extraosseous disease extension.

Median of Absolute Pain Reduction
kV images <90% kV images ≥90% p
All patients (n = 188 vs 67) 5 6 0.07
All patients with total fraction > 1 (n = 171 vs 58) 5 6 0.07
Site = Spine (n = 86 vs 24) 5 5.5 0.86
Site = Lower extremities (n = 59 vs 26) 5 6.5 0.03
Site = Upper and lower extremities
(n = 73 vs 31)
5 6 0.05
 Total fractions = 5 (n = 57 vs 24) 5 6.5 0.01
 Total fractions ≤5 (n = 78 vs 38) 4 5.5 0.05
 Total fractions >5 (n = 110 vs 31) 5 6 0.64
 Total fractions = 10 (n = 77 vs 22) 5 6 0.74
 Total fractions ≤ 10 (n = 165 vs 61) 5 6 0.19
 Total fractions >10 (n = 23 vs 8) 5 7 0.41
 Patients with extraosseous disease (n = 112 vs 39) 5 5.5 0.37
 Site = Spine (n = 58 vs 20) 5 5.5 0.42
 Site = Lower extremities (n = 33 vs 14) 5 5 0.08
 Site = Upper and lower extremities (n = 42 vs 18) 5 5 0.10
 Total fractions = 5 (n = 34 vs 14) 4 7 0.003
 Total fractions = 10 (n = 44 vs 12) 5 6.5 0.86
Patients with total fractions = 1 (n = 13 vs 13) 2 4 0.35

The bold values denote p values indicating statistical significance, i.e. p ≤ 0.05.