Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 12;47(4):544–563. doi: 10.1111/nan.12681

TABLE 2.

Fatty acid compositional profiles of total lipids from frontal cortex area 8 in controls, sALS, sFTLD‐TDP and c9FTLD cases assessed with gas chromatography

Control sALS sFTLDTDP c9FTLD p
Fatty acids
14:0 1.44 ± 0.09 1.47 ± 0.17 1.51 ± 0.08 1.54 ± 0.12 0.716
16:0 24.73 ± 1.13 24.34 ± 2.06 24.91 ± 1.55 24.04 ± 1.51 0.946
16:1n7 1.61 ± 0.15 1.87 ± 0.39 1.92 ± 0.22 2.02 ± 0.23 0.643
18:0 24.8 ± 0.53 28.28 ± 2.62 24.3 ± 0.54 23.52 ± 0.55 0.05
18:1n9 21.77 ± 1.41 19.8 ± 3.05 23.07 ± 1.84 23.89 ± 2 0.586
18:1n7 4.58 ± 0.21 3.63 ± 0.63 4.94 ± 0.19 4.72 ± 0.19 0.105
18:2n6 0.77 ± 0.12 0.7 ± 0.13 0.61 ± 0.05 0.59 ± 0.02 0.475
18:3n3 0.07 ± 0.01 0.08 ± 0.01 0.07 ± 0.01 0.08 ± 0.01 0.962
18:4n3 0.94 ± 0.06 1.18 ± 0.25 1.06 ± 0.09 0.88 ± 0.08 0.512
20:0 0.24 ± 0.00 0.3 ± 0.03 0.25 ± 0 0.24 ± 0.01 0.073
20:1n9 1.32 ± 0.17 1.93 ± 0.66 1.41 ± 0.25 1.35 ± 0.23 0.993
20:2n6 0.45 ± 0.04 0.54 ± 0.19 0.46 ± 0.08 0.42 ± 0.06 0.954
20:3n3 0.69 ± 0.03 0.67 ± 0.04 0.61 ± 0.02 0.63 ± 0.08 0.282
20:4n6 4.89 ± 0.21 5.02 ± 0.51 4.71 ± 0.32 4.49 ± 0.33 0.764
20:3n6 0.27 ± 0.05 0.17 ± 0.02 0.16 ± 0.03 0.16 ± 0.04 0.161
22:0 0.03 ± 0.001 0.03 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.001 0.03 ± 0.001 0.113
20:5n3 0.61 ± 0.13 0.59 ± 0.1 0.51 ± 0.04 0.42 ± 0.03 0.278
22:1 0.06 ± 0.01 0.08 ± 0.03 0.07 ± 0.01 0.07 ± 0.01 0.964
22:4n6 2.83 ± 0.19 2.58 ± 0.21 2.53 ± 0.16 2.32 ± 0.06 0.225
22:5n6 0.52 ± 0.06 0.39 ± 0.06 0.49 ± 0.09 0.40 ± 0.08 0.578
22:5n3 0.11 ± 0.01 0.14 ± 0.03 0.11 ± 0.02 0.12 ± 0.02 0.99
24:0 0.48 ± 0.07 0.51 ± 0.1 0.42 ± 0.04 0.48 ± 0.08 0.985
22:6n3 4.17 ± 0.47 3.22 ± 0.64 3.6 ± 0.46 3.33 ± 0.52 0.704
24:1n7 1.1 ± 0.22 1.41 ± 0.5 1.18 ± 0.25 1.29 ± 0.3 0.992
24:5n3 1.3 ± 0.22 0.82 ± 0.16 0.81 ± 0.13 2.74 ± 1.4 0.329
24:6n3 0.21 ± 0.05 0.26 ± 0.08 0.25 ± 0.06 0.24 ± 0.05 0.978
Fatty acid indexes
SFA 51.71 ± 1.48 54.92 ± 2.96 51.44 ± 1.95 49.85 ± 1.89 0.533
UFA 48.29 ± 1.48 45.08 ± 2.96 48.56 ± 1.95 50.15 ± 1.89 0.513
PUFA 17.83 ± 0.65 16.36 ± 1.25 15.97 ± 0.79 16.81 ± 1.66 0.892
MUFA 30.46 ± 2.03 28.72 ± 3.71 32.59 ± 2.72 33.34 ± 2.88 0.441
PUFAn3 8.1 ± 0.54 6.97 ± 0.94 7.01 ± 0.64 8.43 ± 1.55 0.092
PUFAn6 9.73 ± 0.33 9.39 ± 0.51 8.96 ± 0.26 8.38 ± 0.35 0.039 b , d
ACL 18.13 ± 0.02 18.06 ± 0.03 18.02 ± 0.01 18.12 ± 0.1 0.964
DBI 109.63 ± 1.72 99.69 ± 4.97 103.11 ± 1.66 108.54 ± 6.55 0.691
PI 89.01 ± 4.24 78.44 ± 7.69 79.03 ± 5.25 84.98 ± 10.49 0.809
Estimated desaturase and elongase activities
Δ9(n−7) 0.07 ± 0.01 0.09 ± 0.03 0.08 ± 0.01 0.09 ± 0.02 0.506
Δ9(n−9) 0.89 ± 0.08 0.77 ± 0.15 0.96 ± 0.1 1.03 ± 0.11 0.433
Δ5(n−6) 22.08 ± 4.98 30.13 ± 2.64 32.52 ± 3.9 42.36 ± 12.89 0.768
Δ6(n−3) 15.14 ± 2.36 18.94 ± 5.96 16.19 ± 2.51 12.78 ± 2.01 0.302
Δ6(n−3) 0.21 ± 0.07 0.52 ± 0.24 0.42 ± 0.14 0.25 ± 0.09 0.444
Elovl3(n−9) 0.06 ± 0.01 0.14 ± 0.09 0.06 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.01 0.928
Elovl6 1.01 ± 0.03 1.23 ± 0.2 0.99 ± 0.04 1 ± 0.05 0.997
Elovl1‐3‐7a 0.01 ± 0 0.01 ± 0 0.01 ± 0 0.01 ± 0 0.346
Elovl1‐3‐7b 0.1 ± 0.01 0.1 ± 0.02 0.14 ± 0.01 0.11 ± 0.01 0.164
Elovl1‐3‐7c 19.55 ± 3.24 29.26 ± 11.07 13.45 ± 2.66 21.54 ± 5.25 0.105
Elovl5(n−6) 0.66 ± 0.12 1.12 ± 0.5 0.79 ± 0.16 0.73 ± 0.11 0.672
Elovl2‐5 (n−6) 0.59 ± 0.05 0.56 ± 0.09 0.56 ± 0.07 0.54 ± 0.05 0.42
Elovl 2–5(n−3) 0.2 ± 0.03 0.23 ± 0.04 0.21 ± 0.03 0.29 ± 0.06 1
Elovl 2(n−3) 12.17 ± 2.04 6.38 ± 0.5 8.24 ± 1.93 36.21 ± 20.44 0.028 a , b , c
Peroxisome β‐oxidation 1.54 ± 0.22 1.36 ± 0.29 1.52 ± 0.27 1.47 ± 0.24 0.691

Values are reported as mean±SEM from 6 to 8 cases and are expressed as mol%. Inter‐group differences were measured by pairwise Kruskal–Wallis test applying a Bonferroni correction. Minimum significance level is set at p < 0.05. Estimated desaturase and elongase activities from specific product/substrate ratios: Δ9(n−7), ratio 16:1n−9/16:0; Δ9(n−9), ratio 18:1n−9/18:0; Δ5(n−6), ratio 20:4n−6/20:3n−6; Δ6(n−3), ratio 18:4n−3/18:3n−3; Δ6(n−3), ratio 24:6n−3/24:5n−3; Elovl3(n−9), ratio 20:1n−9/18:1n−9; Elovl6, ratio 18:0/16:0; Elovl1‐3‐7a, ratio 20:0/18:0; Elovl1‐3‐7b, ratio 22:0/20:0; Elovl1‐3‐7c, ratio 24:0/22:0; Elovl5(n−6), ratio 20:2n−6/18:2n−6; Elovl2‐5 (n−6), ratio 22:4n−6/20:4n−6; Elovl 2–5(n−3), 22:5n−3/20:5n−3; Elovl 2(n−3), 24:5n−3/22:5n−3; Peroxisome β‐oxidation, ratio 22:6n−3/24:6n−3.

a

Control versus sALS.

b

Control versus sFTLD‐TDP.

c

Control versus c9FTLD.

d

sFTLD‐TDP versus c9FTLD.