Table 3.
Mean and median outcomes for 10 agree/disagree questions rated on a Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) regarding the acceptability of practices in the poultry industry.
| Questions regarding practices in the poultry industry | Highly educated women (n = 143) | REST (n = 86) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Median | Mean | Median | |
| The culling of day-old male layer chicks is a good solution. | 1.72 | 1 | 2.24 | 2 |
| There is no problem with culling day-old male layer chicks. | 1.66 | 1 | 2.13 | 2 |
| The culling of day-old male layer chicks is inevitable. | 1.87 | 2 | 2.37 | 2 |
| Day-old male layer chicks may be culled | 2.07 | 2 | 2.45 | 2 |
| Because day-old male layer chicks have another use, this eliminates the need for an alternative to CMC. | 2.01 | 2 | 2.41 | 2 |
| Chickens can be kept for food production. | 3.52 | 4 | 3.92 | 4 |
| An alternative is needed for the culling of day-old male layer chicks. | 4.49 | 5 | 4.22 | 4 |
| The use of dual-purpose breeds is a good alternative to the culling of day-old male layer chicks. | 3.41 | 4 | 3.24 | 3 |
| Rearing male layers is a good alternative to the culling of day-old male layer chicks. | 3.51 | 4 | 3.47 | 4 |
| In-ovo sex determination is a good alternative to the culling of day-old male layer chicks. | 3.85 | 4 | 3.85 | 4 |
Likert scale used here: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree.